Adblock Plus asks for “security” money

Status
Not open for further replies.

Petrovic

Level 64
Thread author
Verified
Honorary Member
Top Poster
Well-known
Apr 25, 2013
5,355
There have been howls of derision on the interwebs after it was revealed that ad-blocking browser Adblock Plus has been paid off by Google, Amazon, Microsoft, and Taboola.

What appeared to have been a brilliant bit of software which kept adverts out of your browser, has turned into something of a debacle.

PC Mag said that that one digital media company, which asked not to be named, said Eyeo had asked for a fee equivalent to 30 percent of the additional ad revenues that it would make from being unblocked.

What this means is that all you need to do to make a bit of dosh is write an ad-blocking code, it does not even have to work that well, and show up at the Big IT companies and say: “That is a nice bit of advertising, it would be terrible if something happened to it” and collect your cheque.

PC Mag ummed and ahed about how advertising drives the free Web and sites were not staying in business long these days, but the fact that you have to pay people who write anti-advertising software to look the other way does strike us as the central part of the story.

What this means is that the big companies who can afford to pay, can run adverts while the smaller magazines will see their sites blocked. In short the big guys win and the little sites are stuffed.
 
Y

yigido

There have been howls of derision on the interwebs after it was revealed that ad-blocking browser Adblock Plus has been paid off by Google, Amazon, Microsoft, and Taboola.
It is a paid extension by others :)
What this means is that the big companies who can afford to pay, can run adverts while the smaller magazines will see their sites blocked. In short the big guys win and the little sites are stuffed.
AdblockPlus will come out of its line.
"Acceptable Ads" are mostly these companies ads and the weird thing is these ads are in the filters list. o_O
 

dhul.karnain

Level 2
Verified
May 21, 2013
61
For a long while, ABP was the only viable ad-blocker, but times have changed.
There are now various blockers (for all major browsers - something that ABP never succeeded to do right) with almost the same functionality but without all the performance and ethical issues associated with ABP.
Try pairing µBlock with a few quality filter lists and you'll hardly even remember ABP.
 

marg

Level 12
Verified
May 26, 2014
581
There was a time I did not need adblock plus when most sites ran static ads. Now these sites use jump in your face flashing ads & in your face video's that open without your consent. At least ABP stops most of them still.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Alhaitham and Kent

Pandy

Level 1
Verified
Nov 19, 2014
39
Like exterminator20 said, I use uBlock too.
Havent had any problems and it seems to run better and lighter than others.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FreddyFreeloader
Status
Not open for further replies.

About us

  • MalwareTips is a community-driven platform providing the latest information and resources on malware and cyber threats. Our team of experienced professionals and passionate volunteers work to keep the internet safe and secure. We provide accurate, up-to-date information and strive to build a strong and supportive community dedicated to cybersecurity.

User Menu

Follow us

Follow us on Facebook or Twitter to know first about the latest cybersecurity incidents and malware threats.

Top