NANO AntivirusDo those guys at those at AV Comparatives expect me to believe that? I've read enough code and I've spent enough years sitting on a chair typing to know that these tests are nothing more than a money-fed up, bizarre scam. We don't know what they do behind the scenes, we don't know what they do while "testing" a product, we do not know what contract they've made with the AV companies. Can you guys trust my following sentence?
"I am a computer expert. I'd like to tell you that Nano Antivirus is better. It performed excellent in my tests, I own an AV test company named Super Nano Antivirus Technology Inc. Ltd.©™℠ ® which is a multiple-billion dollar$ company. Can you install it from www.referencedbysupernanaoantivirustechnologyfornanoantivirus.com? Thanks. *shows stat*.
Just don't understand why some people here trust home made test by users here and they can't trust this companies that have more methodology or documentation. They are explaining what they did plus they run this test monthly so I don't know. (Read all they do)
You don't know the users nor the company people doing this but at least you can find credentials because they are open for you. So what is it here then....
how bitdefender and avira detects more than 360 if 360 uses both engines?
Just don't understand why some people here trust home made test by users here and they can't trust this companies that have more methodology or documentation. They are explaining what they did plus they run this test monthly so I don't know. (Read all they do)
You don't know the users nor the company people doing this but at least you can find credentials because they are open for you. So what is it here then....
Exactly totally agree with youYup they do post their methodologies and rate the products according to that. But people still like to believe they are tampering the results for money, because their favorite AV didn't score good.
Yup they do post their methodologies and rate the products according to that. But people still like to believe they are tampering the results for money, because their favorite AV didn't score good.
Because, do you think these guys are contracted by the AV companies to increase their score? I don't think they're gonna submit all the samples to the vendors before performing tests? Do you think they care? Because only a few thousand users are gonna see the review. At maximum. But, if it is the case of a "huge" company like AV-comparatives, they're surely gonna tamper the results. I don't trust them. I love ESET, but I didn't even think of it when writing my last post.Just don't understand why some people here trust home made test by users here and they can't trust this companies that have more methodology or documentation. They are explaining what they did plus they run this test monthly so I don't know. (Read all they do)
You don't know the users nor the company people doing this but at least you can find credentials because they are open for you. So what is it here then....
What these AV labs don't mention is how they pick their samples, and why those samples represent those actually going 'round the Internet infecting people's machines - crickets!They do publish their methodology: http://www.av-comparatives.org/testing-methodology/
Sure, people may disagree with their methodology. But I do not think they are biased as Austrian NGO laws are such that any money they make must be reinvested and not pocketed by the company. There is no reason for them to be biased.
Because, do you think these guys are contracted by the AV companies to increase their score? I don't think they're gonna submit all the samples to the vendors before performing tests? Do you think they care? Because only a few thousand users are gonna see the review. At maximum. But, if it is the case of a "huge" company like AV-comparatives, they're surely gonna tamper the results. I don't trust them. I love ESET, but I didn't even think of it when writing my last post.
What these AV labs don't mention is how they pick their samples, and why those samples represent those actually going 'round the Internet infecting people's machines - crickets!
Bty - Kaspersky says it's easy to pass these tests because they know how to program for them.
May I ask how does an AV "spy" on us?The funny part is that when you install any AV security software on your system, it is automatically spying on you and giving out information about yourself. lol Stop being fanboys and discredit every single test that is done out there.
May I ask how does an AV "spy" on us?
http://www.av-test.org/en/statistics/malware/
Look at the chart for last 12 months.Still a doubt about the flaws? As I said,any tests these days is useless.I still dont understand why someone would argue over a drop in bucket type test.
This type of testing is getting more and more problematic.