Mini Spy

Loading...

Latest Threads

Loading...
 

Avast 6 free antivirus vs Microsoft Security Essentials.

Discussion in 'War Room' started by Tommy, Feb 28, 2011.

?

Avast 6 Free or Microsoft Security Essentials?

  1. Avast 6 Free

    88.6%
  2. Microsoft Security Essentials

    11.4%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Tommy

    Tommy

    Reputation:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2011
    Messages:
    28
    Likes Received:
    0
    I would go with Avast free antivirus due to all it's features and I think it eats less RAM this Microsoft Security Essentials. Microsoft Security Essentials is really just an antivirus with nothing added in my opinion.
     
  2. Tweak

    Tweak Regular Member

    Reputation:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2011
    Messages:
    261
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think Avast without question, simply much more offered, self protection MSE lacks, just a much better option in my opinion.
     
  3. Chiron

    Chiron Super Moderator

    Reputation:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2011
    Messages:
    259
    Likes Received:
    26
    I'd choose Avast.

    MSE is good, but it doesn't have the configurability I need in an AV.
     
  4. Valentin N

    Valentin N Regular Member

    Reputation:
    1
    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2011
    Messages:
    1,289
    Likes Received:
    18
    100% avast; it has more features and you can config as you want it :)

    MSE2 is user friendly because the user has few options and since average users don't like to play around or explore the product it is so user friendly.
     
  5. Linuxfever

    Linuxfever Administrator

    Reputation:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2011
    Messages:
    126
    Likes Received:
    4
    Avast 6, it has more features and it offers a better prevention rate.
    MSE is just a basic antivirus solution.
     
  6. bogdan

    bogdan 1 of the 4 MalwareTips Founder

    Reputation:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2011
    Messages:
    1,411
    Likes Received:
    16
    Here-s my experience with MSE (some time ago): Really simple interface, targeted at every Windows user. When it came out it had really good detection rate (maybe it still has) and almost no false-positives. I am sure that the low FP rate is still there because I don't think that Microsoft can afford having many false-positives (companies will complain if their files are detected as malicious). It includes cloud technology: Dynamic Signature Service Feature and SpyNet (scary name). On the downside, removing a file (even if it was not running) was slow. Full-scans were extremely slow and RAM usage was high. Again, this was some time ago.

    Avast has good signatures too and it is light on system resources. Not all shields are useful to me, I only install the webshield and the Network Shield. Since I mainly use webmail I have no use for the mail shield and the only p2p that I am rarely using are torrents - there is plenty of time for the AV to scan a file. Avast evolved allot, v5 was practically a new product and it was mostly bug-free. V6 introduces important technologies, but at this point they do not work at their full potential.

    Both products can't protect the system on their own. Maybe if you have a low security risk, run under a standard account (LUA) and have a router that includes a firewall an av can be sufficient. You need backups too. But in most cases you'll need to pair it up with some other form of protection.
     
  7. bunyip783

    bunyip783 Regular Member

    Reputation:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2011
    Messages:
    141
    Likes Received:
    24
    Would it be wrong of me to prefer MSE? As of now, I think it outperforms Avast. Sure, maybe once they get the auto sandbox working properly, it will be better, but for now I prefer MSE. The performance of a product is more important than it's mass supply of features, especially when they can't protect you as well as something so basic.
     
  8. AyeAyeCaptain

    AyeAyeCaptain Regular Member

    Reputation:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2011
    Messages:
    558
    Likes Received:
    0
    I would say Avast, due to what it offer... In my opinion I find MSE very limited but is good enough for those who want free turn on and forget protection (if you can call it full protection?!). It's all just a case of opinion and what works for the end user to be honest.
     
  9. bogdan

    bogdan 1 of the 4 MalwareTips Founder

    Reputation:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2011
    Messages:
    1,411
    Likes Received:
    16
    No, you are allowed to say it :)

    Actually you might be right since avast doesn't have good heuristics, according to the last av-comparative test. Avast Free detected only 43% of the samples, the only product that detected less was PCTools SywareDoctor+AV. On the other hand, MSE scored more on the on-demand test.

    I was just disappointed at that time with MSE's high memory usage and slow scans. It also lacked self-protection.
     
  10. Tommy

    Tommy

    Reputation:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2011
    Messages:
    28
    Likes Received:
    0
    Don't worry we don't attack other people for there opinions. Unlike somebody I know but that's off topic :p I love to hear others opinions.
     
  11. Chiron

    Chiron Super Moderator

    Reputation:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2011
    Messages:
    259
    Likes Received:
    26
    Don't misunderstand my post. MSE is still one of my top 3 standalone antiviruses that I would recommend to people.

    I just like Avast a little bit more.
     
  12. HeffeD

    HeffeD Super Moderator

    Reputation:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2011
    Messages:
    1,666
    Likes Received:
    3
    Both are pretty capable, but I would go with Avast because it's more full featured.
     
  13. bogdan

    bogdan 1 of the 4 MalwareTips Founder

    Reputation:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2011
    Messages:
    1,411
    Likes Received:
    16
    BTE, how much RAM MSE uses now? I know this is not necessarily relevant for over-all performance but keeping in mind that you need extra security products to obtain a good config you can't afford wasting 100 MB on the AV.
     
  14. Valentin N

    Valentin N Regular Member

    Reputation:
    1
    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2011
    Messages:
    1,289
    Likes Received:
    18
    it uses for about 50MB os it's heavy on the ram. CIS (the complete Suite) only uses 10-15 MB
     
  15. bogdan

    bogdan 1 of the 4 MalwareTips Founder

    Reputation:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2011
    Messages:
    1,411
    Likes Received:
    16
    It is still better than 80-100MB that was using when it first came out.
     
  16. Valentin N

    Valentin N Regular Member

    Reputation:
    1
    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2011
    Messages:
    1,289
    Likes Received:
    18
    True :)
     
  17. OracleJMT

    OracleJMT New Member

    Reputation:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2011
    Messages:
    21
    Likes Received:
    0
    Avast 6 without any doubt.. MSE lacks to many features, like a BB or a sandbox. - But the other way around, it's good, if you just want a good free signature based AV with ok heuristics. :)
     
  18. Valentin N

    Valentin N Regular Member

    Reputation:
    1
    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2011
    Messages:
    1,289
    Likes Received:
    18
    It does have behavior analyzes component but I am not sure how well it works.

    Keep in mind that Avast's sandbox and the BB are young and hasn't reached their full potential. Avast still relies on their signatures and are therefore not much better than MSE in this point of view.
     
  19. OracleJMT

    OracleJMT New Member

    Reputation:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2011
    Messages:
    21
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ok, I did not know, that MSE has a BB, but it's nice enough then. Anyway, I would still go Avast, cause it's my view, that Avast is more light on system resources..
     
  20. Dejan

    Dejan

    Reputation:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2011
    Messages:
    543
    Likes Received:
    1
    I think Avast! 6 is probably better, just because it offers features MSE doesn't. Like the sandbox and WebRep add-on, just my option.
     

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
MalwareTips.com is an independent website.All trademarks mentioned on this page are the property of their respective owners.