Scareware pusher loses appeal against epic $163 million fine

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jack

Administrator
Thread author
Verified
Staff Member
Well-known
Jan 24, 2011
9,377
The US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) iscelebrating what it calls a "huge victory for consumers", after an appeal court threw out an attempt to overturn a massive fine imposed on Kristy Ross, a former representative of scareware marketing firm Innovative Marketing Inc. (IMI) which pushed fake security products such as WinFixer and XP Antivirus.

Ross was the last hold-out in the case after several others accepted punishments handed to them by courts, including an $8 million fine imposed on Marc D’Souza, described by the FTC as "one of the key defendants behind the scam".

The case got under way in late 2008 when the FTC brought an action against the Belize-registered IMI, along with fellow scareware marketer ByteHosting Internet Services, LLC, operating out of Ohio.

The action requested a restraining order preventing the firms, which operated under numerous aliases in many countries, from pretending to have scanned people's computers and found security problems.

This technique is the go-to trick for scareware scammers, also referred to as "rogue anti-virus", which usually manifests as a pop-up that warns victims of spurious infections found on their system. They are then offered a cleaning utility for a fee, which is usually around the same price as real consumer-grade security products.

Of course the infection is bogus - the utility is usually nothing more than a flashy front-end that mirrors the standard look and feel of real products - and the fee goes into the pockets of the scammers.

In some cases, more aggressive pop-ups are used, with features that make them hard to close. In other cases the "anti-virus" product actually includes backdoors or other malicious features.

In the case of IMI and ByteHosting, by the time the FTC got their restraining order in place, over a million victims were thought to have been hit by the scam.

After the imposition of the order, a judge imposed contempt

Read more: http://nakedsecurity.sophos.com/201...es-appeal-against-epic-163-million-fine-poll/
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

About us

  • MalwareTips is a community-driven platform providing the latest information and resources on malware and cyber threats. Our team of experienced professionals and passionate volunteers work to keep the internet safe and secure. We provide accurate, up-to-date information and strive to build a strong and supportive community dedicated to cybersecurity.

User Menu

Follow us

Follow us on Facebook or Twitter to know first about the latest cybersecurity incidents and malware threats.

Top