{"id":427004,"date":"2026-10-12T05:47:15","date_gmt":"2026-10-12T05:47:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/malwaretips.com\/blogs\/?p=427004"},"modified":"2026-10-12T05:47:15","modified_gmt":"2026-10-12T05:47:15","slug":"feeding-our-future-fraud-fake-meal-claims","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/malwaretips.com\/blogs\/feeding-our-future-fraud-fake-meal-claims\/","title":{"rendered":"Feeding Our Future Fraud: How Fake Meal Claims Fueled a $250 Million Scam"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A program meant to feed children should leave a straightforward trail: food bought, meals served, and records that match. Feeding Our Future became a very different story.<\/p><div id=\"mwtad763714616\" class=\"gas_fallback-ad_309684--placement_406659\" style=\"margin-top: 50px;margin-right: 10px;margin-bottom: 50px;margin-left: 10px;\"><script async src=\"\/\/pagead2.googlesyndication.com\/pagead\/js\/adsbygoogle.js?client=ca-pub-7750719144850257\" crossorigin=\"anonymous\"><\/script><ins class=\"adsbygoogle\" style=\"display:block;\" data-ad-client=\"ca-pub-7750719144850257\" \ndata-ad-slot=\"3957935887\" \ndata-ad-format=\"auto\" data-full-width-responsive=\"true\"><\/ins>\n<script> \n(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); \n<\/script>\n<\/div>\n<p>The Feeding Our Future fraud case is easier to understand when you follow the meal claim, rather than the headlines, from a neighborhood site to public money.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-427005\" width=\"1280\" height=\"900\" src=\"https:\/\/malwaretips.com\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/feeding-our-future-fraud-fake-meal-claims-image-1.png\" alt=\"Authentic DOJ announcement of the Feeding Our Future ringleader sentence, captured with mt_screenshot\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/malwaretips.com\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/feeding-our-future-fraud-fake-meal-claims-image-1.png 1280w, https:\/\/malwaretips.com\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/feeding-our-future-fraud-fake-meal-claims-image-1-300x211.png 300w, https:\/\/malwaretips.com\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/feeding-our-future-fraud-fake-meal-claims-image-1-1024x720.png 1024w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1280px) 100vw, 1280px\" \/><\/figure>\n<div id=\"mwtad4280579601\" class=\"gas_fallback-ad_309746-ad_309685-placement_406660\" style=\"margin-top: 30px;margin-bottom: 30px;\"><script async src=\"\/\/pagead2.googlesyndication.com\/pagead\/js\/adsbygoogle.js?client=ca-pub-7750719144850257\" crossorigin=\"anonymous\"><\/script><ins class=\"adsbygoogle\" style=\"display:block;\" data-ad-client=\"ca-pub-7750719144850257\" \ndata-ad-slot=\"4456629336\" \ndata-ad-format=\"auto\" data-full-width-responsive=\"true\"><\/ins>\n<script> \n(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); \n<\/script>\n<\/div><h2>Overview<\/h2>\n<h3>This was reimbursement fraud, not an ordinary donation appeal<\/h3>\n<p>Feeding Our Future was a Minnesota nonprofit sponsor participating in a federally funded child nutrition program. Its role connected meal sites with the process for receiving reimbursements.<\/p><div id=\"mwtad3470569568\" class=\"gas_fallback-ad_381396-ad_309685-placement_406667\" style=\"margin-top: 50px;margin-bottom: 50px;\"><script async src=\"\/\/pagead2.googlesyndication.com\/pagead\/js\/adsbygoogle.js?client=ca-pub-7750719144850257\" crossorigin=\"anonymous\"><\/script><ins class=\"adsbygoogle\" style=\"display:block;\" data-ad-client=\"ca-pub-7750719144850257\" \ndata-ad-slot=\"1471373341\" \ndata-ad-format=\"auto\" data-full-width-responsive=\"true\"><\/ins>\n<script> \n(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); \n<\/script>\n<\/div>\n<p>The fraud centered on claims for meals that had not been served as represented. It was not simply a charity spending donations on an unpopular expense.<\/p>\n<p>Families needing food were not the people required to pay an enrollment fee. The money at issue came through public reimbursement claims.<\/p>\n<p>That distinction changes the warning signs. A convincing fundraiser is one question; whether claimed meals, attendance, invoices, and payments agree is another.<\/p><div id=\"mwtad2576320210\" class=\"gas_fallback-ad_309686-ad_309685-placement_406668\" style=\"margin-top: 50px;margin-right: 10px;margin-bottom: 50px;margin-left: 10px;\"><script async src=\"\/\/pagead2.googlesyndication.com\/pagead\/js\/adsbygoogle.js?client=ca-pub-7750719144850257\" crossorigin=\"anonymous\"><\/script><ins class=\"adsbygoogle\" style=\"display:block;\" data-ad-client=\"ca-pub-7750719144850257\" \ndata-ad-slot=\"6935453015\" \ndata-ad-format=\"auto\" data-full-width-responsive=\"true\"><\/ins>\n<script> \n(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); \n<\/script>\n<\/div>\n<h3>Criminal findings establish the central deception<\/h3>\n<p>A <a href=\"https:\/\/www.justice.gov\/usao-mn\/pr\/federal-jury-finds-feeding-our-future-mastermind-and-co-defendant-guilty-250-million\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">federal jury convicted Aimee Bock and Salim Said<\/a> in March 2025. Bock led Feeding Our Future; Said formerly co-owned Safari Restaurant.<\/p>\n<p>The Justice Department described a scheme involving roughly $250 million. In May 2026, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.justice.gov\/opa\/pr\/feeding-our-future-ringleader-sentenced-500-months\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Bock received a 500-month prison sentence<\/a> for her role.<\/p>\n<p>Those are specific court outcomes, not a finding that every nonprofit, employee, meal provider, or person mentioned alongside the case committed a crime.<\/p><div id=\"mwtad3179304630\" class=\"gas_fallback-ad_381401-ad_309685-placement_406669\" style=\"margin-top: 50px;margin-right: 10px;margin-bottom: 50px;margin-left: 10px;\"><script async src=\"\/\/pagead2.googlesyndication.com\/pagead\/js\/adsbygoogle.js?client=ca-pub-7750719144850257\" crossorigin=\"anonymous\"><\/script><ins class=\"adsbygoogle\" style=\"display:block;\" data-ad-client=\"ca-pub-7750719144850257\" \ndata-ad-slot=\"5315249587\" \ndata-ad-format=\"auto\" data-full-width-responsive=\"true\"><\/ins>\n<script> \n(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); \n<\/script>\n<\/div>\n<p>The convictions also do not turn legitimate children\u2019s meals into a suspicious activity. The deception lay in records and claims used to obtain money improperly.<\/p>\n<h3>The useful questions follow the actual meals<\/h3>\n<p>For a worker, volunteer, or concerned family, the practical issue is whether the paperwork describes something that genuinely happened.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Do reported meals fit the site\u2019s actual service, space, and operating hours?<\/li>\n<li>Can food purchases and distribution records explain the claimed volume?<\/li>\n<li>Who prepares the attendance information, and who checks it independently?<\/li>\n<li>Does the payment recipient match the approved organization or provider?<\/li>\n<li>Are staff being asked to confirm events they never witnessed?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<div id=\"mwtad1552038152\" class=\"gas_fallback-ad_381404-ad_309685-placement_406670\" style=\"margin-top: 50px;margin-right: 10px;margin-bottom: 50px;margin-left: 10px;\"><script async src=\"\/\/pagead2.googlesyndication.com\/pagead\/js\/adsbygoogle.js?client=ca-pub-7750719144850257\" crossorigin=\"anonymous\"><\/script><ins class=\"adsbygoogle\" style=\"display:block;\" data-ad-client=\"ca-pub-7750719144850257\" \ndata-ad-slot=\"8735619847\" \ndata-ad-format=\"auto\" data-full-width-responsive=\"true\"><\/ins>\n<script> \n(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); \n<\/script>\n<\/div><p>A mismatch warrants a careful question or factual report. It is not permission to accuse a child, community, or unrelated organization online.<\/p>\n<div id=\"mwtad1973787466\" class=\"gas_fallback-ad_309747-ad_309685-placement_406661\" style=\"margin-top: 30px;margin-bottom: 30px;\"><script async src=\"\/\/pagead2.googlesyndication.com\/pagead\/js\/adsbygoogle.js?client=ca-pub-7750719144850257\" crossorigin=\"anonymous\"><\/script><ins class=\"adsbygoogle\" style=\"display:block;\" data-ad-client=\"ca-pub-7750719144850257\" \ndata-ad-slot=\"9589536513\" \ndata-ad-format=\"auto\" data-full-width-responsive=\"true\"><\/ins>\n<script> \n(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); \n<\/script>\n<\/div><h2>Why a Real Food Program Could Hide a False Claim<\/h2>\n<h3>Urgent need made the promise persuasive<\/h3>\n<p>During the pandemic, getting meals to children was a genuine need. Restrictions disrupted familiar routines, including the places families normally relied on for food.<\/p>\n<p>Program waivers expanded participation and allowed approaches such as off-site distribution. That flexibility did not authorize invented attendance or reimbursement for meals never provided.<\/p>\n<p>For someone looking at a busy operation from outside, rapid growth could sound like a successful response to an emergency rather than a reason for scrutiny.<\/p>\n<p>The harder question was not whether more children needed help. It was whether the specific number of meals being billed had actually reached them.<\/p>\n<h3>Paperwork can feel more solid than it is<\/h3>\n<p>A spreadsheet looks orderly. An invoice looks formal. A signed form looks accountable. None of those features independently establishes that its contents are true.<\/p>\n<p>When several documents come from people coordinating the same false account, agreement between them can be manufactured. A second document is not always a second source.<\/p>\n<p>Imagine a hypothetical site recording a full day of service while its own staff schedule shows the doors were closed. The contradiction matters more than the spreadsheet\u2019s appearance.<\/p>\n<p>Useful oversight brings different records together: service observations, purchasing, staffing, deliveries, and payments. Each should explain part of the same real operation.<\/p>\n<div id=\"mwtad1769508571\" class=\"gas_fallback-ad_309748-ad_309685-placement_406662\" style=\"margin-top: 30px;margin-bottom: 30px;\"><script async src=\"\/\/pagead2.googlesyndication.com\/pagead\/js\/adsbygoogle.js?client=ca-pub-7750719144850257\" crossorigin=\"anonymous\"><\/script><ins class=\"adsbygoogle\" style=\"display:block;\" data-ad-client=\"ca-pub-7750719144850257\" \ndata-ad-slot=\"3906789406\" \ndata-ad-format=\"auto\" data-full-width-responsive=\"true\"><\/ins>\n<script> \n(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); \n<\/script>\n<\/div><h2>How the Feeding Our Future Scam Worked<\/h2>\n<h3>Step 1: Sites entered a legitimate reimbursement pathway<\/h3>\n<p>The scheme operated through meal sites under a sponsor. Feeding Our Future connected sites with claims submitted to the Minnesota Department of Education.<\/p>\n<p>The state department administered the reimbursement flow. The sponsor was not simply a decorative name on a website; its administrative position mattered to getting claims processed.<\/p>\n<p>This arrangement created an apparent route from a local food operation to an established public program. A familiar process made the resulting paperwork easier to trust.<\/p>\n<p>At this stage, a registration or approval could show participation in a program. It could not certify every later attendance entry or meal count.<\/p>\n<p>Readers sometimes collapse those two ideas. A real organization can submit an untrue claim, just as a real business can issue an inaccurate invoice.<\/p>\n<p>The safeguard is to evaluate the activity being reimbursed, not stop at the organization\u2019s existence. Identity checks and delivery checks answer different questions.<\/p>\n<h3>Step 2: Invented service became recorded meal volume<\/h3>\n<p>According to the trial findings, participants created false attendance and meal information. The records represented food service on a scale that did not reflect what happened.<\/p>\n<p>A meal count turns an abstract promise into a financial claim. Increasing that count can increase the reimbursement sought without increasing the actual food delivered.<\/p>\n<p>For a person asked to complete a form, this may look like a small clerical task. Its meaning changes when the form becomes support for public payment.<\/p>\n<p>Do not sign because someone calls it routine or says another person already checked. Ask what you are certifying and whether you have a basis for it.<\/p>\n<p>An honest correction should leave a trace of what changed and why. Quietly replacing records after questions arise can make the underlying events harder to establish.<\/p>\n<p>For example, an attendance entry should not be treated as verified merely because it includes a plausible name. The entry must correspond to the program\u2019s actual service requirements.<\/p>\n<h3>Step 3: The sponsor carried those claims toward payment<\/h3>\n<p>False information became reimbursement requests passed through the sponsor to the administering department. The claimed service, rather than a consumer purchase, supplied the reason for payment.<\/p>\n<p>This is the point where misleading records become more than internal paperwork. Someone outside the operation is being asked to release money based on them.<\/p>\n<p>Several layers can obscure responsibility if each participant assumes another layer did the checking. A worker might trust a manager, who points to a sponsor\u2019s approval.<\/p>\n<p>That chain of reassurance is weaker than independent confirmation. The same incorrect count can travel through multiple offices without becoming more accurate.<\/p>\n<p>A useful question is who actually observed or independently reconciled the service. A list of people who merely received the form does not answer it.<\/p>\n<p>For witnesses, keeping the original instructions matters. They can help distinguish a genuine misunderstanding from a request to make records say something known to be false.<\/p>\n<h3>Step 4: Payments were diverted through participating operations<\/h3>\n<p>The court-established scheme included sham companies, improper administrative fees, and kickbacks. Money intended for meals was diverted rather than used as the reimbursement claims represented.<\/p>\n<p>Paying for administration is not inherently wrong. A fee becomes suspect when it disguises a kickback or pays for work that was never performed.<\/p>\n<p>The relationship between the recipient and the work matters. A payment described as consulting should correspond to identifiable, authorized services, not merely a convenient invoice.<\/p>\n<p>For an auditor, following the money requires more than finding a business name on a bank transfer. The question is why that recipient was entitled to it.<\/p>\n<p>For an ordinary employee, the safe response is narrower. Preserve records you lawfully possess and explain what you personally know, without accessing other people\u2019s accounts.<\/p>\n<p>Do not attempt your own financial investigation by guessing passwords, obtaining private bank statements, or confronting suspected participants. Those actions can create risks unrelated to the original concern.<\/p>\n<h3>Step 5: A convincing total concealed missing service<\/h3>\n<p>The scheme depended on false claims continuing to look like legitimate activity. Large totals could suggest scale and success while hiding whether meals had been delivered.<\/p>\n<p>A high volume is not inherently fraudulent. The issue is whether the operation has records, resources, and credible observations that support the volume.<\/p>\n<p>Comparing unrelated figures without context can also mislead. A service model involving pickup or delivery should not be judged solely by seating capacity inside a building.<\/p>\n<p>Still, an explanation should reconcile the discrepancy rather than simply dismiss it. Who prepared the meals? Where were they distributed? How was the number established?<\/p>\n<p>Those questions keep attention on the actual service. They avoid the opposite mistakes of trusting every impressive total or assuming every unusual operation is dishonest.<\/p>\n<div id=\"mwtad922243174\" class=\"gas_fallback-ad_318930-ad_309685-placement_406663\" style=\"margin-top: 30px;margin-bottom: 30px;\"><script async src=\"\/\/pagead2.googlesyndication.com\/pagead\/js\/adsbygoogle.js?client=ca-pub-7750719144850257\" crossorigin=\"anonymous\"><\/script><ins class=\"adsbygoogle\" style=\"display:block;\" data-ad-client=\"ca-pub-7750719144850257\" \ndata-ad-slot=\"3818335085\" \ndata-ad-format=\"auto\" data-full-width-responsive=\"true\"><\/ins>\n<script> \n(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); \n<\/script>\n<\/div><h2>The Organization and Sites Behind the Claims<\/h2>\n<h3>The sponsor\u2019s identity was real<\/h3>\n<p>Feeding Our Future\u2019s nonprofit status did not make this an imaginary organization. Its real administrative role helped the reimbursement process operate.<\/p>\n<p>That is a useful lesson for other program checks: establish who the organization is, then separately establish whether the represented work occurred.<\/p>\n<p>A registration document answers the first question. It cannot replace evidence for the second, and an official-looking letterhead cannot bridge that gap.<\/p>\n<h3>A site operator had a different role<\/h3>\n<p>A sponsor, a restaurant, a food supplier, and a distribution site can be separate organizations. Their responsibilities should not be merged into one vague label.<\/p>\n<p>When evaluating a concern, identify the particular site, relevant dates, and claimed activity. This makes a report useful without extending an accusation to unrelated operations.<\/p>\n<p>Someone who provided genuine food could be unaware of false administrative records elsewhere. Knowledge, conduct, and legal responsibility require individual evidence.<\/p>\n<h3>A payment description needs a matching purpose<\/h3>\n<p>Labels such as administration or consulting do not explain a payment by themselves. Ask what authorized task was performed, by whom, and for which operation.<\/p>\n<p>For staff keeping accounts, retain original invoices and instructions rather than rewriting them into a neater story. The original wording may explain the transaction.<\/p>\n<p>Do not publish payment recipients\u2019 personal information to crowdsource accusations. Investigators can assess private financial records through appropriate channels.<\/p>\n<h3>The findings belong to the people and conduct proved<\/h3>\n<p>Bock\u2019s and Said\u2019s convictions are concrete findings. Other people\u2019s legal outcomes must be checked individually rather than inferred from a shared organization or surname.<\/p>\n<p>The case is not a reason to stigmatize a neighborhood, ethnic community, or every nonprofit serving children. That would distract from the documented mechanism.<\/p>\n<p>It is a reason to take false service records seriously and preserve independent checks, particularly when public money depends on those records.<\/p>\n<h2>Warning Signs for Workers and Program Participants<\/h2>\n<h3>Instructions to record what you did not observe<\/h3>\n<p>Be cautious when a supervisor asks you to certify attendance, quantities, or dates from memory you do not have. Ask for the underlying records.<\/p>\n<p>If the answer is that everyone signs or that the numbers are needed to keep funding, the question remains unresolved. Funding pressure does not create factual support.<\/p>\n<p>Record your concern neutrally: the form requested a particular count, but your observations covered a different activity. Precise notes are more helpful than dramatic conclusions.<\/p>\n<h3>Records that cannot explain their own totals<\/h3>\n<p>Repeated discrepancies between purchases, staffing, service logs, and claims deserve attention. An occasional error and a coordinated false submission are not the same thing.<\/p>\n<p>Give an honest explanation room to emerge. A corrected date, a separate delivery location, or a missing supplier invoice can sometimes account for a mismatch.<\/p>\n<p>If the explanation keeps changing or someone asks for old files to disappear, preserve your lawful records and seek independent guidance before participating further.<\/p>\n<h2>What to Do if You Have Fallen Victim to This Scam<\/h2>\n<ol>\n<li>\n<p><strong>Start with your actual connection to the problem.<\/strong> A family missing meals, a worker asked to falsify records, and a witness to diversion need different help.<\/p>\n<p>Write down the site, dates, people involved, and what you directly experienced. Separate your observations from information heard from others.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p><strong>Preserve documents you can lawfully access.<\/strong> Keep original messages, instructions, service records, invoices, and relevant photographs, with dates where available.<\/p>\n<p>Do not alter files to make the story clearer. Keep a separate explanation of confusing entries and tell investigators when a record is incomplete.<\/p>\n<p>Avoid gathering private data from accounts or systems you are not entitled to use. Concern about fraud does not authorize unauthorized access.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p><strong>Protect children\u2019s information.<\/strong> Attendance lists, addresses, and family details should not become public evidence posted on social media.<\/p>\n<p>Use official reporting channels and ask how sensitive records should be supplied. A public accusation can expose families who had no role in wrongdoing.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p><strong>Report concrete suspected misuse through the proper agency.<\/strong> The <a href=\"https:\/\/www.oig.usda.gov\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">USDA Office of Inspector General<\/a> provides a hotline for concerns involving USDA programs.<\/p>\n<p>Describe the specific activity and your source of knowledge. A report about a particular site is more useful than a general claim that a community is dishonest.<\/p>\n<p>Keep the report reference and follow instructions about additional records. Filing a report does not guarantee an investigation, payment, or personal legal protection.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p><strong>Get independent advice if your own conduct is involved.<\/strong> If you signed disputed claims, received questionable funds, or were pressured to change records, consult qualified counsel.<\/p>\n<p>Do not rely on the person who requested the paperwork to explain your obligations. Do not assume resigning or returning money resolves every issue.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p><strong>Keep genuine food needs separate from the investigation.<\/strong> Families should contact an independently verified program administrator or trusted local service about available meals.<\/p>\n<p>Do not stop seeking legitimate assistance because a different organization committed fraud. Also avoid giving sensitive family information to strangers claiming to arrange case compensation.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p><strong>Reject paid recovery or settlement shortcuts.<\/strong> An unsolicited promise to recover your share of public funds is not an official entitlement.<\/p>\n<p>Ordinary taxpayers do not automatically receive an individual refund because a criminal case concerns public money. Verify any real notice through the issuing agency.<\/p>\n<p>If someone separately took a payment from you, preserve that transaction and contact its payment provider promptly. Explain that separate incident without assuming it belongs to this case.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<h2>Frequently Asked Questions<\/h2>\n<h3>What was the Feeding Our Future fraud?<\/h3>\n<p>It was a criminal scheme involving false child nutrition reimbursement claims. Records represented meals and attendance that did not reflect the service provided.<\/p>\n<h3>Was Feeding Our Future a real nonprofit?<\/h3>\n<p>Yes. Its sponsor role was real. That identity did not make false meal claims legitimate or establish that every participating site performed the claimed work.<\/p>\n<h3>Did the court convict everyone connected with the organization?<\/h3>\n<p>No. Bock and Said\u2019s jury convictions concern their proved conduct. Other people\u2019s cases and responsibilities must be assessed separately.<\/p>\n<h3>Was the $250 million taken from individual donors?<\/h3>\n<p>The amount describes the public-program fraud scheme, not a single consumer donation campaign. It should not be read as an automatic refund entitlement for taxpayers.<\/p>\n<h3>Does a large meal count prove a site committed fraud?<\/h3>\n<p>No. Compare the claim with the actual distribution model, purchasing, staffing, and service records. A discrepancy needs investigation, not an unsupported public accusation.<\/p>\n<h3>Where should a worker report a concern?<\/h3>\n<p>Use the appropriate program authority or USDA OIG hotline for suspected USDA-program misuse. Preserve lawful records privately and seek counsel if your own conduct is implicated.<\/p>\n<h2>The Bottom Line<\/h2>\n<p>The Feeding Our Future fraud turned false meal records into public payments. Do not sign or submit service claims you know are invented.<\/p>\n<p>If you encountered questionable records or missing services, preserve what you lawfully know and report it officially. Keep children\u2019s needs and private information protected throughout.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A program meant to feed children should leave a straightforward trail: food bought, meals served, and records that match. Feeding Our Future became a very different story. The Feeding Our Future fraud case is easier &#8230; <\/p>\n<p class=\"read-more-container\"><a title=\"Feeding Our Future Fraud: How Fake Meal Claims Fueled a $250 Million Scam\" class=\"read-more button\" href=\"https:\/\/malwaretips.com\/blogs\/feeding-our-future-fraud-fake-meal-claims\/#more-427004\" aria-label=\"Read more about Feeding Our Future Fraud: How Fake Meal Claims Fueled a $250 Million Scam\">Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":51,"featured_media":427005,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[49],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-427004","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-scam-reports","masonry-post","generate-columns","tablet-grid-50","mobile-grid-100","grid-parent","grid-50","resize-featured-image"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/malwaretips.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/427004","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/malwaretips.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/malwaretips.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/malwaretips.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/51"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/malwaretips.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=427004"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/malwaretips.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/427004\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":427006,"href":"https:\/\/malwaretips.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/427004\/revisions\/427006"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/malwaretips.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/427005"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/malwaretips.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=427004"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/malwaretips.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=427004"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/malwaretips.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=427004"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}