Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
5 Common Myths About Your Antivirus
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MDTechVideos" data-source="post: 328501" data-attributes="member: 2049"><p>Below is a general outline that I typed out when producing the video so that I would hit on all the points I wanted to. Note it might not be the most grammatically correct statement as I wrote it in Notepad but at-least Google Translate should be able to help. (note this may not be in the same order as discussed in the video). </p><p></p><p><strong>1) Detection Rate is everything</strong></p><p>FALSE</p><p>Some people believe that detection is everything. This is simply not the case. Often malware can have many variants, or in other words be very similar in coding to other malware. If a large portion of threats are built off of the same code, all the antivirius has to </p><p>do it find the common link between all of the variants and they can stop the threat. However threats often can evolve through</p><p>creating new mutations and this will not always be the case. A proper mix of different types of samples from adaware, to spyware, </p><p>to trojans should be used in the tested malware pool if possible. Also with time more and more antivirus companies</p><p>will have been able to incorporate these malicious samples into their own databases. Through online submission site VirusTotal</p><p>participating antiviruses are used to scan files to determine if they are malicious or not. As an reward for joining</p><p>the service, the 50 some engines on the site are given information about malware detected, speeding up the time it takes</p><p>for antivirus to detect threats. While this may be a great tool, it also speeds up the shelf life of malware so detection </p><p>rates will be higher if they are using this service. Often malware testing groups will advertise rankings based off of detection rate. </p><p>Even at a 99.9% detection, that is no definitive solution. When hand sanatizer says it cleans 99.9% of viruses does that mean I am not protected against the one hundredth of a percent? Virus signatures can not be released to consumers using an antivirus product before a piece of malware is released in the wild. But the ability to detect samples that have been released, less say within a day or two, that is how we can see an antivirus performing under the most harsh conditions. Importantly, this fails to consider malware that mayhave originated in a place on the otherside of the world. While it can happen, malware that originates in places like southeast Asia</p><p>have a difficult time of flourishing in places like North America. Excluding the high profile cases malware just does not typically spread as globally as we might initially think. So while a Iranian antivirus might be able to detect 100% of threats in Iran, that might mean very little to someone in Canada. That is why picking western world antivirus might be a better choice for someone living in the west and vice versa for the east. Not saying they are bad products, just perhaps not used in the right part of the world. While I show detection rates simply to show that all of the known threats of malware to the antivirus have been removed, take the detection rate with </p><p>a grain of salt. </p><p></p><p><strong>2) You can't use two antivirus at the same time. </strong></p><p>While true, it is misinterpreted. </p><p></p><p>The information about this topic online can be a little bit confusing, so I believe</p><p>this is a good starting place to begin. A common misconception is that if you have two security</p><p>products running on the system at the same time they will conflict with one another over detections</p><p>and memory usage. While most antiviruses can not and I am going to repeat that, CAN NOT be used side by side, there are plenty of security products</p><p>that are compadilble, or that will work alongside, your antivirus. Going back over a decade ago, most of the big name antivirus like</p><p>McAfee, Norton, and Trend Micro were specifically tasked in finding and detecting viruses. Not designed to </p><p>protect against a vast aray of threats like adware, spyware, keyloggers and such. This is where programs like Ad-Aware, SuperAntiSpyware</p><p>and Spybot Search and Destory came into existence. Ad-Adware was founded in the late 1990's on blocking tracking information on websites. superantispware focused on spyware</p><p>and spybot focused on pretty much the same stuff as the last two. These programs complimented the traditional</p><p>antiviruses that people were using on their computers. However, over the years the term malware began to engluph the specialties of</p><p>all of these spyware and adware removal programs and combine them under the umbrella of the antivirus name. However, companies have surfaced over the more recent years that can work in conjunction with your</p><p>traditional antivirus. Malwarebytes, Immunnent, Webroot and Avast (if set in compadbility mode during install) can all work with other antiviruses. It is important to note</p><p>that even if the products are compadible, the system may experince some slowdown. Even if products claim to be compatiable with most antiviruses on the market I would recomend excluding the files and processes from each security product from one another to reduce the chance of any conflict. A simple google search should be able to explain step by step on how to exclude files or folders from respective security software solutions. So while generally speaking you should not run two antiviruses at the same time, there are security applications out there that will run with your existing antivirus. If you want to check you computer for malware using a scanner other than your antivirus, there is a vast assortment of malware removal scanners you can run that are not antiviruses. You can run as many of them as you like. I have recently put out some reviews of free malware removal tools so do not be afraid</p><p>to check them out. </p><p></p><p><strong>3) If an antivirus detects a threat as being malicious the file is definitely malware</strong></p><p></p><p>FALSE</p><p></p><p>Antivirus companies inadvertently create false positives every day. Simply put a false positive is when antivirus software</p><p>detects a non-malicious file as malware. Sometimes these false positives can be very innocent, </p><p>like flagging a pirated video game or even detecting themselves as malware. However, some false positives</p><p>can be very destructive, in some extreme cases rendering the entire operating system unusable. In some cases the effects </p><p>of a false positive can be more destructive than an actual malware infection. </p><p></p><p>In early 2010, McAfee detected svchost, a critical windows process, which caused computers to not only</p><p>loos internet access but to enter an endless reboot. </p><p></p><p>In 2010, a faulty update produced by AVG caused Windows 7 computers to experince a similar endless-reboot of their </p><p>computers as with the McAfee error. </p><p></p><p>In 2011, Microsoft Security Essentials, the worlds most used antivirus, removed Google Chrome, labeling </p><p>it as a Trojan</p><p></p><p>False positives are common occurences that happens all of the time. </p><p>That is why most antivirus have exclusions the user can set for files or folders on the </p><p>computer or for websites online that are being blacklisted, or flagged, by a webfilter</p><p>as being malicious. </p><p></p><p>Most of the more well known security suites offer an online submission of files that </p><p>may be detected in error. </p><p></p><p>If you believe your antivirus is detecting a file in error, feel free to submit the sample </p><p>for a re-evulation. In the comment section below I have a link to a site where you can find information to submit samples</p><p>to a vast number of antivirus manufactures. However, it should be noted that the larger</p><p>the community that an antivirus is serving, typically the false positive will be identified and remedied much faster than with smaller companies. </p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>4) The more security I have on my computer the more secure I am. </strong></p><p>FALSE</p><p></p><p>Going back to the previous myth, while it is certainly okay to run multiple security applications at the same time it is not suggested to run as many compatible products that you</p><p>can find. You are just asking for trouble. I have seen many configurations over the years that people have shared with me. I have seen an antivirus, firewall booster, behavior blocker, web filter and keylogger programs all put on the same computer. My advice: download some free on demand scanners, meaning that do not run unless you are running a scan. Links to some of the reviews will be in the </p><p>description. More than likely if you have all of these programs running on your computer you are computer savy enough not to aimlessly browse the web. My saying is simiplicity is king. I personally use Comodo Internet Security which is a free, all in one antivirus, firewall, web filter and a virtual browser that I can browse the internet safety without worrying about any mistakenly downloaded programs making changes to my hard drive. I find that much better than have 4 or 5 different programs bogging down my computer. </p><p></p><p><strong>5) Paid is <u>always</u> better than free</strong></p><p></p><p>FALSE</p><p></p><p>***For consumers home use. I believe this is not only false for security software but a lot of software in general. However we will focus on the </p><p>computer security aspect of this myth. </p><p></p><p>While I believe cosumer understanding on this matter has improved </p><p>in the right dirrection, I still believe it is a significant enough problem to address in this video. </p><p>In todays world most househoulds have several internet connected devices, whether it be smartphones, tablets or traditional computers. </p><p>To protect these investments people can spend up to $100 dollars a year to protect all these devices. All of these</p><p>devices only depreciate in value over time. If $100 is put out year after year, eventually someone could have bought a modest new computer</p><p>with the amount of money they spent. This myths has its roots back over a decade ago when most antiviruses on the market could only be purchased through yearly licenses. As the decade moved on free av's began to emerge and today there are many to choose from. In a 2014 Opswat concluded that nearly 50 percent of antiviruses users are being protected with free products. For consumers, free antiviruses are usually the way to go. With estimates ranging from 15 to 25 percent of computers not having any security product installed there is no reason to say no to the price of free. Even without the bells and whistles of registry cleaners and telephone support, most consumers can find assistance if needed through online forums and simple web searches for common issues or concerns. I have always been weary of 2 or 3 year license plans with one antivirus company. Products performance can go from being great one year to being dismantaled and bought out by another companany the next. Or the product will become bloated with unnessisary features for the next release. Not saying it can happen but it is always something that has kept me from being commited with antivirus licenses.If you insist on using paid software, make sure you understand your payment method as some antiviruses automatically renew payment each year. </p><p></p><p>***The one exception to this myth is for buisnesses and enterprises. Most companies withdraw the free option to buisnesses that are using their product and only</p><p>offer paid security software. Specific information pertaining to respective vendors can often be found in the end user license agreement that is agreed to when </p><p>downloading just about any product from online.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MDTechVideos, post: 328501, member: 2049"] Below is a general outline that I typed out when producing the video so that I would hit on all the points I wanted to. Note it might not be the most grammatically correct statement as I wrote it in Notepad but at-least Google Translate should be able to help. (note this may not be in the same order as discussed in the video). [B]1) Detection Rate is everything[/B] FALSE Some people believe that detection is everything. This is simply not the case. Often malware can have many variants, or in other words be very similar in coding to other malware. If a large portion of threats are built off of the same code, all the antivirius has to do it find the common link between all of the variants and they can stop the threat. However threats often can evolve through creating new mutations and this will not always be the case. A proper mix of different types of samples from adaware, to spyware, to trojans should be used in the tested malware pool if possible. Also with time more and more antivirus companies will have been able to incorporate these malicious samples into their own databases. Through online submission site VirusTotal participating antiviruses are used to scan files to determine if they are malicious or not. As an reward for joining the service, the 50 some engines on the site are given information about malware detected, speeding up the time it takes for antivirus to detect threats. While this may be a great tool, it also speeds up the shelf life of malware so detection rates will be higher if they are using this service. Often malware testing groups will advertise rankings based off of detection rate. Even at a 99.9% detection, that is no definitive solution. When hand sanatizer says it cleans 99.9% of viruses does that mean I am not protected against the one hundredth of a percent? Virus signatures can not be released to consumers using an antivirus product before a piece of malware is released in the wild. But the ability to detect samples that have been released, less say within a day or two, that is how we can see an antivirus performing under the most harsh conditions. Importantly, this fails to consider malware that mayhave originated in a place on the otherside of the world. While it can happen, malware that originates in places like southeast Asia have a difficult time of flourishing in places like North America. Excluding the high profile cases malware just does not typically spread as globally as we might initially think. So while a Iranian antivirus might be able to detect 100% of threats in Iran, that might mean very little to someone in Canada. That is why picking western world antivirus might be a better choice for someone living in the west and vice versa for the east. Not saying they are bad products, just perhaps not used in the right part of the world. While I show detection rates simply to show that all of the known threats of malware to the antivirus have been removed, take the detection rate with a grain of salt. [B]2) You can't use two antivirus at the same time. [/B] While true, it is misinterpreted. The information about this topic online can be a little bit confusing, so I believe this is a good starting place to begin. A common misconception is that if you have two security products running on the system at the same time they will conflict with one another over detections and memory usage. While most antiviruses can not and I am going to repeat that, CAN NOT be used side by side, there are plenty of security products that are compadilble, or that will work alongside, your antivirus. Going back over a decade ago, most of the big name antivirus like McAfee, Norton, and Trend Micro were specifically tasked in finding and detecting viruses. Not designed to protect against a vast aray of threats like adware, spyware, keyloggers and such. This is where programs like Ad-Aware, SuperAntiSpyware and Spybot Search and Destory came into existence. Ad-Adware was founded in the late 1990's on blocking tracking information on websites. superantispware focused on spyware and spybot focused on pretty much the same stuff as the last two. These programs complimented the traditional antiviruses that people were using on their computers. However, over the years the term malware began to engluph the specialties of all of these spyware and adware removal programs and combine them under the umbrella of the antivirus name. However, companies have surfaced over the more recent years that can work in conjunction with your traditional antivirus. Malwarebytes, Immunnent, Webroot and Avast (if set in compadbility mode during install) can all work with other antiviruses. It is important to note that even if the products are compadible, the system may experince some slowdown. Even if products claim to be compatiable with most antiviruses on the market I would recomend excluding the files and processes from each security product from one another to reduce the chance of any conflict. A simple google search should be able to explain step by step on how to exclude files or folders from respective security software solutions. So while generally speaking you should not run two antiviruses at the same time, there are security applications out there that will run with your existing antivirus. If you want to check you computer for malware using a scanner other than your antivirus, there is a vast assortment of malware removal scanners you can run that are not antiviruses. You can run as many of them as you like. I have recently put out some reviews of free malware removal tools so do not be afraid to check them out. [B]3) If an antivirus detects a threat as being malicious the file is definitely malware[/B] FALSE Antivirus companies inadvertently create false positives every day. Simply put a false positive is when antivirus software detects a non-malicious file as malware. Sometimes these false positives can be very innocent, like flagging a pirated video game or even detecting themselves as malware. However, some false positives can be very destructive, in some extreme cases rendering the entire operating system unusable. In some cases the effects of a false positive can be more destructive than an actual malware infection. In early 2010, McAfee detected svchost, a critical windows process, which caused computers to not only loos internet access but to enter an endless reboot. In 2010, a faulty update produced by AVG caused Windows 7 computers to experince a similar endless-reboot of their computers as with the McAfee error. In 2011, Microsoft Security Essentials, the worlds most used antivirus, removed Google Chrome, labeling it as a Trojan False positives are common occurences that happens all of the time. That is why most antivirus have exclusions the user can set for files or folders on the computer or for websites online that are being blacklisted, or flagged, by a webfilter as being malicious. Most of the more well known security suites offer an online submission of files that may be detected in error. If you believe your antivirus is detecting a file in error, feel free to submit the sample for a re-evulation. In the comment section below I have a link to a site where you can find information to submit samples to a vast number of antivirus manufactures. However, it should be noted that the larger the community that an antivirus is serving, typically the false positive will be identified and remedied much faster than with smaller companies. [B] 4) The more security I have on my computer the more secure I am. [/B] FALSE Going back to the previous myth, while it is certainly okay to run multiple security applications at the same time it is not suggested to run as many compatible products that you can find. You are just asking for trouble. I have seen many configurations over the years that people have shared with me. I have seen an antivirus, firewall booster, behavior blocker, web filter and keylogger programs all put on the same computer. My advice: download some free on demand scanners, meaning that do not run unless you are running a scan. Links to some of the reviews will be in the description. More than likely if you have all of these programs running on your computer you are computer savy enough not to aimlessly browse the web. My saying is simiplicity is king. I personally use Comodo Internet Security which is a free, all in one antivirus, firewall, web filter and a virtual browser that I can browse the internet safety without worrying about any mistakenly downloaded programs making changes to my hard drive. I find that much better than have 4 or 5 different programs bogging down my computer. [B]5) Paid is [U]always[/U] better than free[/B] FALSE ***For consumers home use. I believe this is not only false for security software but a lot of software in general. However we will focus on the computer security aspect of this myth. While I believe cosumer understanding on this matter has improved in the right dirrection, I still believe it is a significant enough problem to address in this video. In todays world most househoulds have several internet connected devices, whether it be smartphones, tablets or traditional computers. To protect these investments people can spend up to $100 dollars a year to protect all these devices. All of these devices only depreciate in value over time. If $100 is put out year after year, eventually someone could have bought a modest new computer with the amount of money they spent. This myths has its roots back over a decade ago when most antiviruses on the market could only be purchased through yearly licenses. As the decade moved on free av's began to emerge and today there are many to choose from. In a 2014 Opswat concluded that nearly 50 percent of antiviruses users are being protected with free products. For consumers, free antiviruses are usually the way to go. With estimates ranging from 15 to 25 percent of computers not having any security product installed there is no reason to say no to the price of free. Even without the bells and whistles of registry cleaners and telephone support, most consumers can find assistance if needed through online forums and simple web searches for common issues or concerns. I have always been weary of 2 or 3 year license plans with one antivirus company. Products performance can go from being great one year to being dismantaled and bought out by another companany the next. Or the product will become bloated with unnessisary features for the next release. Not saying it can happen but it is always something that has kept me from being commited with antivirus licenses.If you insist on using paid software, make sure you understand your payment method as some antiviruses automatically renew payment each year. ***The one exception to this myth is for buisnesses and enterprises. Most companies withdraw the free option to buisnesses that are using their product and only offer paid security software. Specific information pertaining to respective vendors can often be found in the end user license agreement that is agreed to when downloading just about any product from online. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top