AI Expert: ‘Terminator’ Entirely Possible

Prorootect

Level 69
Thread author
Verified
Nov 5, 2011
5,855
AI Expert: ‘Terminator’ Entirely Possible : on trunews.com:
AI Expert: ‘Terminator’ Entirely Possible
2018-TruNews-Terminator-Statue-Getty.jpg

An expert in artificial intelligence said an event like the "Judgement Day" depicted in the "Terminator" movies is entirely possible due to a backdoor security flaw in the "Internet of Things."


January 12, 2018

An expert in artificial intelligence believes it’s entirely possible that a military AI could become self-aware and turn against humanity, and with interconnected military assets, it would likely resemble scenes from the movie “Terminator.”

During a visit last month, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers fellow Paul Werbos told South Korea’sJoongAng Daily newspaper that the “Internet of Things” features a backdoor that is a security risk for the entire world. He spoke mainly of the threat it posed from North Korean hacker groups, but also spoke of a Hollywood-inspired scenario like the Arnold Schwarzenegger film.

The movie [‘The Terminator’] is very realistic, we need to avoid that path,' he said. "But a core idea in the Internet of Things is that if we want more efficiency, we should have one controlled system that integrates everything in an efficient way and controls everything in the world as one big Internet of Things. And this is happening very, very fast.
This Internet of Things will be running the world, and if the pieces don’t fit, it could be a gigantic mess. So my message to this community is, we need to develop the global platform in a human-friendly way. It’s easy to cheat and develop a computer program that doesn’t need humans. But if we govern the whole world with a computer platform that doesn’t need humans, humans may suffer. And that is what I’m really worried about. But I don’t think anyone has the answer. This is what scares me."


Werbos said scientists and artificial intelligence programmers need to “talk to teach other across different sectors and disciplines” to find the solution.
 
Last edited:

tim one

Level 21
Verified
Honorary Member
Top Poster
Malware Hunter
Jul 31, 2014
1,086
The creation of an AI with consciousness is a just a dream. Building a robot, independent, autonomous and able to have its own creativity, emotions and a conscience, may seem just a few steps from becoming reality: nothing could be more wrong.
We have a primitive knowledge of neuroscience and the creation and composition of consciousness, so the real possibility of transferring this ability to a machine, is practically nothing. It is still early, then, for being outclassed by a robot.
 

mlnevese

Level 26
Verified
Top Poster
Well-known
May 3, 2015
1,533
I wonder why these specialists never consider the possibility of builtin hardware fail safe measures... It's just like the specialists that think it's strange we never detected other civilizations... if they are more advanced than us and using communication technology we have not developed yet we'd just be blind to their communications even if we were surrounded by others... If they are on the same level they may just be too far for their radio signals to have reached us, if they are less advanced they just may not have developed radio communication in the period we are able to observe...
 

Vasudev

Level 33
Verified
Nov 8, 2014
2,228
I wonder why these specialists never consider the possibility of builtin hardware fail safe measures... It's just like the specialists that think it's strange we never detected other civilizations... if they are more advanced than us and using communication technology we have not developed yet we'd just be blind to their communications even if we were surrounded by others... If they are on the same level they may just be too far for their radio signals to have reached us, if they are less advanced they just may not have developed radio communication in the period we are able to observe...
Maybe Intel should design the terminators and if the robot doesn't follow order, simply ask Intel for available backdoors and delete the memory core and you're done.
Security first objective complete.
 

ElectricSheep

Level 14
Verified
Top Poster
Well-known
Aug 31, 2014
655
Maybe Intel should design the terminators and if the robot doesn't follow order, simply ask Intel for available backdoors and delete the memory core and you're done.
Security first objective complete.
First laugh of the day! :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vasudev

mlnevese

Level 26
Verified
Top Poster
Well-known
May 3, 2015
1,533
Maybe Intel should design the terminators and if the robot doesn't follow order, simply ask Intel for available backdoors and delete the memory core and you're done.
Security first objective complete.

Isn't it an example of bult-in hardware fail-safe? :cool:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vasudev

Vasudev

Level 33
Verified
Nov 8, 2014
2,228
Yep.
An example of how Intel's Patch works in In-House_Terminator based robots:
Me: Get me a tea, its 8 am.
Robot: Sure sir...Wait a second... System Patching in Progress (On LCD/OLED panel). Please re-iterate your query,sir?
Me: Why not? Please bring a cup of tea.
Robot: Why not spice up your morning with a dose of meth as well.:devil:
Me: Disassembles the robot and throws in the trash can.
 

About us

  • MalwareTips is a community-driven platform providing the latest information and resources on malware and cyber threats. Our team of experienced professionals and passionate volunteers work to keep the internet safe and secure. We provide accurate, up-to-date information and strive to build a strong and supportive community dedicated to cybersecurity.

User Menu

Follow us

Follow us on Facebook or Twitter to know first about the latest cybersecurity incidents and malware threats.

Top