D
Deleted member 178
Thread author
Most probably me too .I'm not very worried about the yellow line for Emsisoft
Apparently Kaspersky System Watcher was able to block WannaCry RWCan someone answer me this question? Does Kaspesky identify Wannacry Ransomware before it has Wannacry Ransomware signature? Can you help me @harlan4096
I know that Hitman Pro Alert, Malwarebytes 3, Emsisoft and Kaspersky blocked this Ransomware without signatures by using behavior blocker technology.
Oh yes, missed that .At MWHub I tested WannaCry with all the main modules disabled bu SW (also no InterNet connection)...
https://malwaretips.com/threads/w-anna-cry-v2.71397/#post-628222
Though I don't always affirm with these tests, it's good to see Symantec rise, knowing that their solutions are widely implemented and relied on in the industries. If I'm not wrong, Symantec is already levelling up their game by integrating and improving advanced ML algorithms in cloud.The good part is Symantec is back.
But is not the panacea, better not to rollback
The paid version has more features yeah, but i'm talking about basic protection. Panda Free is put up in these tests against paid versions of Bitdefender, Kaspersky, Avira, Eset and has been putting up numbers every time. If these tests are anything to go by, then Panda should "technically" be the best free av available right? Unless we assume that Bitdefender free protects just as well as the paid version, Panda looks like the winner here.the free version is okay, but the internet security is better because of including the data shield (against ransomware).
I'm a Panda user