Status
Not open for further replies.

jamescv7

Level 61
Trusted
Verified
So for that test, seems a little fact where Avira and Bitdefender have definite spot than before where place on 1st and 2nd place.

However the problem rely on yellow marks which are never counted at all especially BB with user interaction approval like F-secure, Emsisoft, AVG and few others which should change the overall ranks.
 

OokamiCreed

Level 18
Trusted
Verified
I always feel these tests are very inaccurate... I always get a bit or a lot different results. Panda better in real world test when compared to ESET, Bitdefender, Kaspersky, and Emsisoft? That's pretty funny... Get out of here with that.
 

Cch123

Level 7
Verified
There is nothing surprising about Panda and Trend Micro performing well on this test. They are considered among the small group of AV companies that are trustable. Mind you, Trend Micro is the third largest provider of endpoint protections. In corporate environments, they shield against threats that home users will never imagine facing, and they would be ditched if they can't protect the networks. Also, their cloud reputation and behaviour blocker has improved by a lot in the 2015 edition.

As for Panda, they are one of the pioneers of cloud technologies and behaviour blockers. As mentioned by others, real world protection tests consider every aspect of the software and not just signature protection. Eset undoubtedly have some of the best signatures and its malware analysis teams are really fast at adding definitions. However, as always in such tests, there is the "luck" component.
 
  • Like
Reactions: woodrowbone
Status
Not open for further replies.