- Mar 20, 2011
- 141
What was 23rd? It was officially released today "Patch a has been officially released. Don't forget to restart your system after updating." 23rd was when the beta version was released for testing.
> Which one can you use with Sandboxie?
> Which one will micro/macro viruses?
> Which one stop scripts?
> Which one stop worms?
Something to think about!
Just because they say it runs, doesn't mean it is optimized... IDS isn't working on x64 with BD 2015, there is no AMSI support too...That's true but even on Bitdefender's Official Site in the system requirements Windows 10 is included.
Protection is working fine, the only things not really working are the custom application rules (which are not needed in 99,99%) and the interface self protection, RAM cleanup and rollback don't really matter since an infected machine has to be formated anyways.Does this patch fix the issues with Windows 10, or is it just the same - kind of odd, I cannot find anything of substance on their forums, only that MR1 is soon to start the beta phase. Does that mean Kaspersky users running Windows 10 will have to await that release before adequate protection is offered?
"RAM hog" RAM is there to be used, Bitdefender for example uses over 250MB on a 16GB machine, KIS under 95.BitDefender for sure because KIS is known to be a ram hog and their scans take forever to scan 60 files that are under 20 MBs.
Just because they say it runs, doesn't mean it is optimized... IDS isn't working on x64 with BD 2015, there is no AMSI support too...
Did I state otherwise? Please read and understand first, then reply!Every, and I mean EVERY AV tests says that they are very very close, on some of tests BiDefender is better on some Kaspersky but the difference is very small and you sound like KIS is waaaay better. Please think twice before you post next time.
Bitdefender Forum -> Intrusion DetectionSo, on a 64bit OS Bitdefender's intrusion detection module does not work?
No, Patchguard prohibits software from patching the kernel on x64 so it applies to every x64 user.I dont know why they have such problems, I dont have it, I run Win 10 x64 and everything is ok, maybe they fix that so I think that limitation is for some users only
I am not sure about it because Intrusion Detection System is on Medium since I instal BD (Its on Permissive by default)No, Patchguard prohibits software from patching the kernel on x64 so it applies to every x64 user.
I will repeat myself one last time for you: It's there but it is extremely limited on x64 to the point of being literally useless, you can crank it up to max settings and you won't get any popups while on x86 you will... (with exactly the same testfile), this is because of Patchguard on x64 which (theoretically) prevents the patching and/or hooking of the Windows kernel.I am not sure about it because Intrusion Detection System is on Medium since I instal BD (Its on Permissive by default)
So what you want to say that I am almost unprotected now?I will repeat myself one last time for you: It's there but it is extremely limited on x64 to the point of being literally useless, you can crank it up to max settings and you won't get any popups while on x86 you will... (with exactly the same testfile), this is because of Patchguard on x64 which (theoretically) prevents the patching and/or hooking of the Windows kernel.
No, just that IDS doesn't work and I'm absolutely certain that this feature would be useless for you.So what you want to say that I am almost unprotected now?