Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Testing
Malware Hub: Statistics and Reports
BullGuard IS 2020 - October 2019 Report
Message
<blockquote data-quote="harlan4096" data-source="post: 837537" data-attributes="member: 36043"><p>My 1st impressions after 2 malware tests:</p><p></p><p>1.- On deman/signatures detection ratio are very low -> similar to those I got here in Hub some months ago with Panda Dome, Nano AV or BitDefender <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite127" alt=":sick:" title="Sick :sick:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":sick:" />. <strong>Update</strong>: I tested the last pack from [USER=32430]@Der.Reisende[/USER] posted yesterdy evening and the detection was 4 / 21, after 12 hours this morning still was 11 / 21...</p><p></p><p>2.- On demand Scan speed is acceptable BUT fix the samples just extracted in a folder <strong>but not running</strong> (moving them to Quarantine) is TERRIBLY SLOW: it took several minutes (<strong>about 7 minutes <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite117" alt=":eek:" title="Eek! :eek:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":eek:" /> <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite117" alt=":eek:" title="Eek! :eek:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":eek:" /></strong>) to just moved 11 samples to Quarantine!!! that's totally inapceptable!</p><p></p><p>3.- It has problems with .jar samples, can't stop completely them, also with scripts.</p><p></p><p>Probably will test for only about 1 or 2 weeks (will be enough to show the weakness of the product), and will record a video since testing so many samples on dynamic is quite time consuming <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite127" alt=":sick:" title="Sick :sick:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":sick:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="harlan4096, post: 837537, member: 36043"] My 1st impressions after 2 malware tests: 1.- On deman/signatures detection ratio are very low -> similar to those I got here in Hub some months ago with Panda Dome, Nano AV or BitDefender :sick:. [B]Update[/B]: I tested the last pack from [USER=32430]@Der.Reisende[/USER] posted yesterdy evening and the detection was 4 / 21, after 12 hours this morning still was 11 / 21... 2.- On demand Scan speed is acceptable BUT fix the samples just extracted in a folder [B]but not running[/B] (moving them to Quarantine) is TERRIBLY SLOW: it took several minutes ([B]about 7 minutes :eek: :emoji_astonished:[/B]) to just moved 11 samples to Quarantine!!! that's totally inapceptable! 3.- It has problems with .jar samples, can't stop completely them, also with scripts. Probably will test for only about 1 or 2 weeks (will be enough to show the weakness of the product), and will record a video since testing so many samples on dynamic is quite time consuming :sick: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top