M

Manzai


ESET has good defended in the test. On URLs, only two URLs have not blocked. One was blocked at runtime, ESET has detected the malware code. The second is missed . On the pack, ESET miss 15 malware. 5 malware is installed. Norton detects some files, the system is infected. ESET remains a good antivirus, but still needs to improve on unknown threats.

Stars : 4/5 => Very good

Caution : The test is executed with @Loupirade ! ;)
 

Petrovic

Level 64
Verified
Trusted
I repeat many times:D



for example:
http://en.kioskea.net/faq/29942-eset-configure-the-hips-intrusion-prevention-system
http://malwaretips.com/threads/petrovic-config.20748/#post-150572
&

ESET need to configure
http://malwaretips.com/threads/eset-smart-security-8-pcmag-review.34872/#post-274789
 

tonibalas

Level 40
Verified
Trusted
great review from both you and as it seems eset needs to improve more their hips becuase unfortunately 0 day malware can still pass through eset defence(HIPS). anyway both of keep up the great work you are doing.;):)
Petrovic you are so right about eset and the video you posted confirms exactly what you mean:)
p.s.:Loupirade i have one request, if it's possible increase the zoom in your videos because the letters and images are small and can't see it clear enough( i don't wear glasses) thanks in advance;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ulikedat and Manzai
Top