Software comparison
ESET Smart Security Premium
Kaspersky Internet Security
OSarmor
Feature comparison
  1. Ease of use
  2. Impact on hardware performance
  3. Core protection (malware and heuristic engine)
  4. Proactive protection (anti-exploit, behavior blocker, IDS-HIPS, sandbox)
  5. Network protection (firewall, anti-botnet)
  6. Ransomware protection

Guilhermesene

Level 4
Verified
Well-known
Jun 1, 2019
180
Hey guys.

I tried OSarmor here and really liked it, but I see that Kaspersky in default deny mode does the same thing.

In your opinion, what would be better?

ESET Smart Security Premium + OSarmor or KIS + default deny mode?

Thank you guys.
 

Andy Ful

Level 75
Verified
Helper
Top poster
Developer
Well-known
Dec 23, 2014
6,451
KIS in @harlan4096 settings will be better for most Home users - it is a very strong and practical solution.
For static software setup, Eset (with HIPS tweaks) + OSA advanced tweaks can be stronger if one will allow in OSA the execution of Microsoft + only a few 3rd party vendors and block anything else.
In practice, you will not see any real advantage when choosing between both solutions.
The second solution will require some learning and much tweaking.
 
Last edited:

NewbyUser

Level 2
Verified
Well-known
Jul 16, 2021
52
KIS in @harlan4096 settings will be better for most Home users - it is a very strong and practical solution.
For static software setup, Eset (with HIPS tweaks) + OSA advanced tweaks can be stronger if one will allow in OSA the execution of Microsoft + only a few 3rd party vendors and block anything else.
In practice, you will not see any real advantage when choosing between both solutions.
The second solution will require some learning and much tweaking
Is OSA really required with Eset? I think it's a bit overkill and Eset is quite capable of providing adequate protection.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dave Russo

Andy Ful

Level 75
Verified
Helper
Top poster
Developer
Well-known
Dec 23, 2014
6,451
Is OSA really required with Eset? I think it's a bit overkill ...
It can be a kind of overkill depending on how the features of both solutions will overlap. Eset with some essential HIPS setup is enough for most users. Yet, in theory, such a setup will not be as strong as KIS with the @harlan4096 settings based on KSN file reputation.
If one would like to use very tight HIPS to cover well the modern threats, then the computer would be hardly usable for most users. Some of the OSA features can make the setup more usable and easier to deploy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: harlan4096

NewbyUser

Level 2
Verified
Well-known
Jul 16, 2021
52
It can be a kind of overkill depending on how the features of both solutions will overlap. Eset with some essential HIPS setup is enough for most users. Yet, in theory, such a setup will not be as strong as KIS with the @harlan4096 settings based on KSN file reputation.
If one would like to use very tight HIPS to cover well the modern threats, then the computer would be hardly usable for most users. Some of the OSA features can make the setup more usable and easier to deploy.
Yes there I agree. OSA is definitely “easier”. Just clicking a box lol. And I don’t see a way of duplicating the trusted provider aspect of OSA with Eset HIPS.
 
Top