Deleted Member 333v73x
Hello, which one do you think is better and why?
If you are paying I'd go for HMPA personally. I was in the same boat and had to choose between paying for one or the other at the end of the year myself. MBAE premium is a bigger company but HMPA covers a lot more, like adding crypto protection and a bunch of goodies on top of the anti-exploit protection.
The only worry with HMPA is they got bought out by Sophos so who knows what the long term plans are. For now they continue as usual.
Is it better than MBAE premium? I don't mind switching too free one.
How is EMET's user friendliness compared to HMPA and MBAE's set and forget usage?
I like MalwareBytes Anti Exploit Free better, in my experience it is lighter and trouble free compared to EMET and HMPA.
Installed EMET ytd and trying out. I can say the UI is very confusing for me. HMPA is much better IMHO followed by MBAE.
Damn alright might just stick with MBAE for the time being, shall begin reading up on other guides on how to properly configure EMET because I ma thinking of changing to that too!
Nice thanks a bunch!Same for me. I felt it a good challenge ( finally got a program to learn how to tweak ).
It's a similar experience playing with COMODO.
Some simple tips on setting EMET below:
Advanced Microsoft Enhanced Mitigation Experience Toolkit (EMET) Tips - gHacks Tech News
Umbra said:MBAE free can't be better than EMET...
What is better against toxic chemicals: a free gas mask or a paid full anti-biohazard suit?
"Layer 4 Application behavior protection Blocks sandbox escapes such as Java exploits, as well as exploits that abuse weak application design in Word, PowerPoint, and others. Last defense against exploits that bypass memory corruption mitigation."