App Review NANO Antivirus Beta Prevention Test (MrITReviews)

[McLovin]

This was requested here by Dashke.



Feedback is always appreciated.

 

[Malware Maniac]

Man Links were bad and NANO only caught 3 or 4 things. What happened to your background at the end of the video?
Why don't you scan packs of malware? All the other reviewers do that.

 

[NSG001]

Thanks again

 

[Malware Maniac]

Nice job.
Thanks again

Dude there is a reason why McLovin Edited his post and your post has been removed because it is a privacy problem and McLovin wanted to stay anonymous. If I knew your name would you want me posting everywhere saying "nice find ..."

 

[Dashke]

Thank you very much for the review!

 

[Plexx]

Why don't you scan packs of malware? All the other reviewers do that.

He only does links test.

Everyone has their own style.

 

[D Bone]

Well, they certainly didn't name it NANO for it's system resource usage that's for sure........Maybe they named it after how many detections it's capable of?

 

[WinAndLinuxTutorials]

Well, they certainly didn't name it NANO for it's system resource usage that's for sure........Maybe they named it after how many detections it's capable of?

A resource hog antivirus with a nano of 1% detection rate.

It was shocking to see a large 270MB file for being called Nano.

 

[InternetChicken]

Nice test Thank you

 

[McLovin]

What happened to your background at the end of the video?
Why don't you scan packs of malware? All the other reviewers do that.

Well since I have not activated my Windows on my VM due to I do give it a reformat now and then.

With the malware packs, I see it as some might have already been detected by the AV already, so if I was to get them live from the website then they might not have caught them.

Thank you very much for the review!

Glad you like it

Thanks again

No problem. Anytime

Nice test Thank you

Your welcome