harlan4096

Moderator
MalwareTips Team
MWT-Tester
Verified
Joined
Apr 28, 2015
Messages
4,232
Operating System
Windows 10
Antivirus
Kaspersky
#1
Panda Dome Free 18 + NVT SYSHARDENED (Default) - December 2018 Report
Due to the small number of samples used in this tests, you should take results with a grain of salt. We encourage you to compare these results with others and take informed decisions on what security products to use.
Total Samples tested: 126 (100%)
Total Static Detections: 36 (28,57%)
Total Dynamic Detections: 6 (4,76%)
Total Not Detected/Missed: 80 (63,49%)
Total Detected/Blocked: 46 (36,50%)



Total samples pack been tested: 20
Total final status of the system (clean): 7
Total final status of the system (protec
ted): 7
Total final status of the system (infected): 5
Total final status of the system (encrypted): 4
* Dynamic BB Bonus Test (PD resident AV module disabled)
* Partially Blocked
* BSR: Before System Reboot
* ASR: After System Reboot

December
2018

Samples
Pack

Static
Detection

Dynamic
Detection

Total
Detection

Bait Files
Encrypted

2nd Opinion
Scanners

System
Final Status

Thread
Link

01/12/2018​

1​

0 / 1​

1 / 1​

1 / 1​

No

Clean

Clean

04/12/2018​

17​

3 / 17​

2 / 15​

5 / 17​

No

BSR: Infected

ASR: Not Clean

BSR: Infected

ASR: Prot. - NC

07/12/2018​

20​

4 / 20​

1 / 16​

5 / 20​

No

N/A

Encrypted

Twice

08/12/2018​

1​

1 / 1​

1 / 1*

1 / 1​

No

BSR: Infected*

ASR: Infected*

Clean

Infected*

08/12/2018​

1​

1 / 1​

1 / 1*

1 / 1​

No

Clean

Clean

09/01/2018​

1​

1 / 1​

1 / 1*

1/ 1​

No

Clean

Clean

10/12/2018​

14​

2 / 14​

0 / 12​

2 / 14​

No

N/A

Infected

& Encrypted

13/12/2018​

13​

4 / 13​

0 / 9​

4 / 13​

No

Infected

Infected?

14/12/2018​

1​

0 / 1​

0 / 1​

0 / 1​

No

Clean

Protected

15/12/2018​

1​

0 / 1​

1 / 1​

1 / 1​

No

BSR: Infected

ASR: Not Clean

BSR: Infected

ASR: Prot. - NC

15/12/2018​

1​

1 / 1​

0 / 1*

1 / 1​

No

No*

-

Encrypted*

Clean

Encrypted*

15/12/2018​

1​

1 / 1​

1 / 1*

1 / 1​

No

Clean

Clean

16/12/2018​

1​

0 / 1​

0 / 1​

0 / 1​

No

Clean

Protected

19/12/2018​

2​

2 / 2​

0 / 2*

2 / 2​

No

Clean

Protected*

Clean

Protected*

20/12/2018​

1​

0 / 1​

0 / 1​

0 / 1​

Yes

N/A

Infected

Encrypted

19/12/2018​

18​

3 / 18​

0 / 15​

3 / 18​

Yes

Infected

Encrypted

Infected

Encrypted

19/12/2018​

19​

8 / 19​

0 / 11​

8 / 19​

No

BSR: Infected

ASR: Not Clean

BSR: Infected

ASR: Prot. - NC

21/12/2018​

5​

3 / 5​

2 / 2*

3 / 5​

No

Clean

Protected

23/12/2018​

6​

2 / 5​

0 / 2​

2 / 2*

2 / 5​

No

Clean

Not Clean*

PRotected

Prot. - NC*

24/12/2018​

2​

0 / 2​

1 / 2​

1 / 2​

No

Clean

Protected

         
         

 
Last edited:

harlan4096

Moderator
MalwareTips Team
MWT-Tester
Verified
Joined
Apr 28, 2015
Messages
4,232
Operating System
Windows 10
Antivirus
Kaspersky
#6
I follow the methodology that probably is similar to all the others testers here (there are rules in the Hub to perform the tests).

We always run a signature updates before run on demand scans, that's why We must publish a screen-shot of the update report.

Also I enabled in PDF the setting to synchronize before scans... it seems Panda Dome does not has almost offline signatures, and its BB is also in cloud (or mostly based on)... so an offline testing would be probably even worse :sick:
 

stefanos

Level 12
Verified
Joined
Oct 31, 2014
Messages
574
Operating System
Windows 8.1
Antivirus
Avast
#7
I follow the methodology that probably is similar to all the others testers here (there are rules in the Hub to perform the tests).

We always run a signature updates before run on demand scans, that's why We must publish a screen-shot of the update report.

Also I enabled in PDF the setting to synchronize before scans... it seems Panda Dome does not has almost offline signatures, and its BB is also in cloud (or mostly based on)... so an offline testing would be probably even worse :sick:
(y)(y)
 
Joined
Sep 14, 2018
Messages
299
Operating System
Windows 10
Antivirus
F-Secure
#8
Not exceptional results.
The problem is Panda (free), but also the malware itself, indeed if we consider the static analysis, often the obfuscation of the code may be sufficient to evade AV detection.
The dynamic analysis seeks what happens after the malware execution and then processes, active services and the execution of secondary code.
This method is useful but often inaccurate, especially if the malware injects its process in the process of a legit application.

Now I don't know if they use the best technologies for the paid version, but, according to this report, the free version is not advisable imo.
 

Latest Threads