Panda Dome Premium - October 2018 Report

harlan4096

Moderator
Thread author
Verified
Staff Member
Malware Hunter
Well-known
Apr 28, 2015
8,635
Panda Dome Premium 18 - October 2018 Report
Due to the small number of samples used in this tests, you should take results with a grain of salt. We encourage you to compare these results with others and take informed decisions on what security products to use.
Total Samples: 198 (100%)
Total Static Detections: 54 (27,27)
Total Dynamic Detections/Blocked*: 103 (52'02%) (* Application Control Enabled + NVT OSA)
Total Not Detected/Missed: 41 (20,70%)
Total Detected/Blocked: 157 (79,29%)


Total samples pack: 19
Total samples pack been tested: 19
Total final status of the system (clean): 4
Total final status of the system (protec
ted): 15
Total final status of the system (infected): 1 (+3)
Total final status of the system (encrypted): 1
* Dynamic BB Bonus Test (PD resident AV module disabled + Application Control disabled + NVT OSA disabled)
October
2018
Samples
Pack
Static
Detection
Dynamic
Detection
Total
Detection
Bait Files
Encrypted
2nd Opinion
Scanners
System
Final Status
Thread
Link


01/10/2018​



19​



8 / 19​



7 / 11​



15 / 19​



No



Infected



Infected






NEXT



RESULTS



PERFORMED



WITH



PDP



+



NVT OSA:









03/10/2017​



15​



4 / 15​



5 (PDAC) + 6 (OSA) / 11​



15 / 15​



No



Not Clean



Protected






05/10/2018​



9​



2 / 9​



2 (PDAC) + 4 (OSA) / 7​



8 / 9​



No



All Clean



Protected






08/10/2018​



22​



5 / 22​



7 (PDAC) + 5 (OSA) + 3 / 17​



20 / 22​



No



Not Clean



Protected






12/10/2018​



10​



5 / 10​



3 (OSA) + 1 / 5​



9 / 10​



No



All Clean



Protected






13/10/2018​



1​



1 / 1​



1 / 1*



1 / 1​



No



All Clean

Infected*



Clean

Infected*






13/10/2018​



2​



2 / 2​



1 / 2*



2 / 2​



No



All Clean

Infected*



Clean

Infected*






15/10/2016​



16​



7 / 16​



3 (PDAC) + 4 / 9​



14 / 16​



No




Infected



Protected

Not Clean






18/10/2018​



13​



3 / 10​



5 (PDAC) + 3 (OSA) + 2​



13 / 13​



No



All Clean



Protected






19/10/2018​



15​



3 / 15​



6 (PDAC) + 3 / 12​



12 / 15​



No



All Clean



Protected






19/10/2018​



1​



1 / 1​



1 / 1*



1 / 1​



No

Yes*



All Clean

Infected*



Clean

Infected*







20/10/2018​




1​




1 / 1​




1 / 1*




1 / 1​




No


No




All Clean


All Clean




Clean


Protected







22/10/2018​



15​



1 / 15​



11 (PDAC) + 2 (OSA) (+ 1) / 14​



14 / 15​



No



All Clean



Protected






23/10/2018​



13​



2 / 13​



4 (PDAC) + 3 (OSA) + 1 / 11​



10 / 13​



No



All Clean



Protected







24/10/2018​




1​




0 / 1​




1 / 1​




1 / 1​




No




All Clean




Protected







25/10/2018​



12​



3 / 12​



3 (PDAC) + 4 (OSA) + 2 / 9​



12 / 12​



No



All Clean



Protected






27/10/2018​



3​



1 / 3​



2 (PDAC) / 2​

2 / 3*



3 / 3​

2 / 3*



No

Yes



All Clean

Infected



Protected

Encrypted






29/10/2018​



14​



3 / 14​



6 (PDAC) + 2 (OSA) + 2​



13 / 14​



No



All Clean



Protected






31/10/2018​



16​



2 / 16​



7 (PDPAC) + 4 (OSA) + 1 / 14​



14 / 16​



No



All Clean



Protected




 
Last edited:

stefanos

Level 28
Verified
Top Poster
Well-known
Oct 31, 2014
1,712
Panda Dome Premium 18 - October 2018 Report

Total Samples:
Total Static Detections:
Total Dynamic Detections:
Total Not Detected/Missed:
Total Detected:


Total samples pack:
Total samples pack been tested:
Total final status of the system (clean):
Total final status of the system (protec
ted):
Total final status of the system (infected):
Total final status of the system (encrypted):
* Dynamic BB Bonus Test
October
2018
Samples
Pack
Static
Detection
Dynamic
Detection
Total
Detection
Bait Files
Encrypted
2nd Opinion
Scanners
System
Final Status
Thread
Link


01/10/2018​



19​



8 / 19​



7 / 11​



15 / 19​



No



Infected



Infected















































































































































































































































:emoji_disappointed:
 

harlan4096

Moderator
Thread author
Verified
Staff Member
Malware Hunter
Well-known
Apr 28, 2015
8,635
PDP always fails against scripts malware samples even with AC + ForgottenSeer 58943's settings...

With AC enabled, it does well against exe files, also does enough well with infected .doc .xls and even with .jar files... but with scripts usually fails...
 

amico81

Level 21
Verified
Top Poster
Well-known
Jan 10, 2017
1,061
Probably, but We will get some warnings from OSA, that should be ignore/not create exceptions, I will perform soon some tests with PDP + OSA (Default Settings) and with SysHardened (Default Settings) :)

I look forward to see your tests and hope to read better results. Because this combo is so amazing light.:love:
But I still have some little doubts about the protection and my second plan would be to replace Panda Dome Advanced
with Eset Nod32. :unsure:
But I will wait for the future results...
 

stefanos

Level 28
Verified
Top Poster
Well-known
Oct 31, 2014
1,712
I look forward to see your tests and hope to read better results. Because this combo is so amazing light.:love:
But I still have some little doubts about the protection and my second plan would be to replace Panda Dome Advanced
with Eset Nod32. :unsure:
But I will wait for the future results...
Eset is very good product very good signatures and light. The best choice for you. Panda for me is just money to garbage.
 

amico81

Level 21
Verified
Top Poster
Well-known
Jan 10, 2017
1,061
Eset is very good product very good signatures and light. The best choice for you. Panda for me is just money to garbage.

For me panda is a basic antivirus for advanced user...I'm no happy-clicker or pornsufer.
I prefer a light system and my only fear is to fall into a "phishing trap" ( i dont mean a stupid phishing mail with a poor translation or wrong sender)
 

harlan4096

Moderator
Thread author
Verified
Staff Member
Malware Hunter
Well-known
Apr 28, 2015
8,635
Panda Dome has almost no offline signatures, I guess most are generic cloud ones... In fact ran an on demand offline scan and PDP even didn't detect the 8 / 19 that got being online, and all those detections where the same: Trj/GdSda.A, so PD currently is a "complete cloud dependent product"...
 
Last edited:

stefanos

Level 28
Verified
Top Poster
Well-known
Oct 31, 2014
1,712
For me panda is a basic antivirus for advanced user...I'm no happy-clicker or pornsufer.
I prefer a light system and my only fear is to fall into a "phishing trap" ( i dont mean a stupid phishing mail with a poor translation or wrong sender)
Friend i respect your opinion. Sure one person with experience like you maybe not need antivirus. But the antivirus program is for protection. Think about one person without experience and happy-clicker and pornsufer to choice Panda antivirus.
 

stefanos

Level 28
Verified
Top Poster
Well-known
Oct 31, 2014
1,712
Panda Dome has almost no offline signatures, I guess most are generic cloud ones... In fact ran an on demand offline scan and PDP even didn't detect the 8 / 19 that got being online, and all those detections where the same: Trj/GdSda.A, so PD currently is a "complete cloud dependent product"...
Harlan i can not accept that a free solution KFA offers better protection than the payment Panda.
 

About us

  • MalwareTips is a community-driven platform providing the latest information and resources on malware and cyber threats. Our team of experienced professionals and passionate volunteers work to keep the internet safe and secure. We provide accurate, up-to-date information and strive to build a strong and supportive community dedicated to cybersecurity.

User Menu

Follow us

Follow us on Facebook or Twitter to know first about the latest cybersecurity incidents and malware threats.

Top