harlan4096

Level 61
Verified
Staff member
Malware Hunter
Panda Dome Premium 18 - September 2018 Report
Due to the small number of samples used in this tests, you should take results with a grain of salt. We encourage you to compare these results with others and take informed decisions on what security products to use.
Total Samples: 111
Total Static Detections: 27 / 111 (24,32%)
Total Dynamic Detections: 62 / 111 (55,85%)
Total Not Detected/Missed: 22 / 111 (19,81%)
Total Detected: 89 / 111 (80,18%)


Total samples pack: 8
Total samples pack been tested: 7
Total final status of the system (clean): 1
Total final status of the system (protec
ted): 2
Total final status of the system (infected): 4
Total final status of the system (encrypted): 0
* Dynamic BB Bonus Test
September
2018
Samples
Pack
Static
Detection
Dynamic
Detection
Total
Detection
Bait Files
Encrypted
2nd Opinion
Scanners
System
Final Status
Thread
Link


03/09/2018​



15​



/ 15​






/ 15​















05/09/2018​



1​



0 / 1​



1 / 1​



1 / 1​



No




Before Reboot: Infected

After Reboot: Clean





Infected

Clean







07/09/2018​



14​



1 / 14​



8 / 13​



9 / 14​



No




Before Reboot: Infected

After Reboot: Infected





Infected

Infected







10/09/2018​



24​



5 / 24​



14 / 19​



19 / 24​



No



Infected



Protected - Not Clean






11/09/2018​



17​



4 / 17​



11 / 13​



15 / 17​



No



Infected



Protected - Not Clean






14/09/2018​



18​



6 / 18​



8 / 12​



14 / 18​



No



Infected



Infected






21/09/2018​



21​



7 / 21​



11 / 14​



18 / 21​



No



Before Reboot: Infected


After Reboot: Infected



Infected


Infected









27/09/2018​



16​



4 / 16​



9 / 12​



13 / 16​



No



Infected



Infected



































































































































 
Last edited:

harlan4096

Level 61
Verified
Staff member
Malware Hunter
"...due to the small number of samples used in this tests, you should take results with a grain of salt..."

Most of the packs had a big amount of scripts files, and still PDP is a bit weak on that (even tweaking it), if You are not a happy clicker, it is ok... anyway You may always pair it with SysHardened and/or OSA, to prevent scripts running...
 

Moonhorse

Level 26
Verified
Content Creator
"...due to the small number of samples used in this tests, you should take results with a grain of salt..."

Most of the packs had a big amount of scripts files, and still PDP is a bit weak on that (even tweaking it), if You are not a happy clicker, it is ok... anyway You may always pair it with SysHardened and/or OSA, to prevent scripts running...
Or any whitelisting software voodooshield, cf, ransomoff, but is the web filtering any good?

It would be interesting to see are the results ' clean' when paired with syshardener like evjl has the avast always doing very clean with sh


@Brie you probably can set eset to default deny untrusted files aswell
 

Moonhorse

Level 26
Verified
Content Creator
Yep it would be nice, since youre already testing high tier av solution as standalone > kaspersky
And lower/ lowest(?) tier > panda
Against eachother

So using panda + some whitelisting/ anti-exe...Syshardener is the best since its tweak tool and doesnt take resources so
Panda + syshardener can be probably lighter and perform as good/ better than kaspersky will alone do
 

stefanos

Level 22
Verified
Panda Dome Premium 18 - September 2018 Report

Total Samples:
Total Static Detections:
Total Dynamic Detections:
Total Not Detected/Missed:
Total Detected:


Total samples pack:
Total samples pack been tested:
Total final status of the system (clean):
Total final status of the system (protec
ted):
Total final status of the system (infected):
Total final status of the system (encrypted):
* Dynamic BB Bonus Test
September
2018
Samples
Pack
Static
Detection
Dynamic
Detection
Total
Detection
Bait Files
Encrypted
2nd Opinion
Scanners
System
Final Status
Thread
Link


03/09/2018​



15​



/ 15​






/ 15​















05/09/2018​



1​



0 / 1​



1 / 1​



1 / 1​



No




Before Reboot: Infected

After Reboot: Clean





Infected

Clean







07/09/2018​



14​



1 / 14​



8 / 13​



9 / 14​



No




Before Reboot: Infected

After Reboot: Infected





Infected

Infected







10/09/2018​



24​



5 / 24​



14 / 19​



19 / 24​



No



Infected



Protected - Not Clean






11/09/2018​



17​



4 / 17​



11 / 13​



15 / 17​



No



Infected



Protected - Not Clean






14/09/2018​



18​



6 / 18​



8 / 12​



14 / 18​



No



Infected



Infected






21/09/2018​



21​



7 / 21​



11 / 14​



18 / 21​



No



Before Reboot: Infected


After Reboot: Infected



Infected


Infected

























































































































































Very bad results. Static detections is really the worst from all paid antivirus. I think and immunet have better static detections from Panda.
 

stefanos

Level 22
Verified
Hum ok I will think on performing some tests with PDP + SysHadened...
I happy to will see this test. But i can't accept when i pay for one antivirus to hope i am secure only if used like combo. Why i not use 360 TS combo or immunet combo or FortiClient combo? All is lighter from Panda, free, with better signatures
 
  • Like
Reactions: harlan4096

amico81

Level 16
Verified
I understand what u wanna say....but i doubt that 360 with bd+avira engine is still light...and we have some ads in the free version.
so we can call it the chinese avast :D and just their own engine+cloud is crap
Forticlient is no av for everybody cause of creating settings/rules with xml tags
 
  • Like
Reactions: stefanos

stefanos

Level 22
Verified
I understand what u wanna say....but i doubt that 360 with bd+avira engine is still light...and we have some ads in the free version.
so we can call it the chinese avast :D and just their own engine+cloud is crap
Forticlient is no av for everybody cause of creating settings/rules with xml tags
Believe me i used and i tested many months 360TS. The cloud signatures from qihoo the last two months is very good. Sure is not the best protection but for me is better from Panda. And combo with voodooshield the protection is perfect. And .........free. Now the last two months i use Kaspersky cloud free. And alone is better from Panda payed
 
  • Like
Reactions: harlan4096

stefanos

Level 22
Verified
Panda Dome Free + OSA + SysHardened should be enough for any user... soon will be perform some tests with Panda Dome Premium + SysHardened (Defaults Settings)...
Sure. Any antivirus with osa sushardener is good. But alone only kaspersky avast avg and bitdefender free is enough for any user. But i wait to see your test. Thanks for your good tests.
 
  • Like
Reactions: harlan4096

Brie

Level 9
Verified
i figured out that panda caught 80% of the malware. that is better than the 60% of immunet.

80% is still not good though. would bitdefender free be better?
 
  • Like
Reactions: stefanos