upnorth

Level 29
Content Creator
Trusted
Verified
German publisher Alex Springer is suing the company behind Adblock Plus for copyright infringement. According to the company, which owns Bild and Die Welt, among others, ad blockers endanger digital journalism and "change the programming code of websites."

There can be little doubt that without revenues generated by advertising, today’s web would be a very different animal. Many sites live or die by the money they bring in via advertising but a growing number of platforms feel that volume can make up for quality, bombarding visitors with what many consider unstoppable spam. For the savvy, of course, plenty of options are available to block the most annoying ads. Many use browser plugins like uBlock or AdBlock Plus to limit the number of ads they see, much to the disappointment of those delivering them.

In an effort to put a stop to this ‘freeloading’, digital publishing company Alex Springer has waged a years-long campaign against German-based developer Eyeo GmbH, the company behind Adblock Plus. The publisher, which owns Bild and Die Welt, among others, claimed that AdBlock Plus and its users undermined its business model. However, after trips through regional and eventually Germany’s Supreme Court, in April 2018 Adblock Plus and Eyeo GmbH came out on top. Now, a year later, Axel Springer has returned for another bite of the cherry. This time the publisher claims that AdBlock Plus infringes copyright. The company’s complaint, reported on by Heise.de, appears to push the boundaries of what is generally accepted as infringement. “Advertising blockers change the programming code of websites and thus directly access the legally protected offer of publishers,” says Claas-Hendrik Soehring, head of media law at Axel Springer. “In the long term, they will not only damage a central financing basis for digital journalism, but will also jeopardize open access to opinion-forming information on the Internet in the long term.”
 

LDogg

Level 28
Verified
Sounds like this content created is majorly butthurt over Adblock Plus using a mild excuse on why a web extension is losing him money. I understand that it's crucial for revenue, but this is now becoming the norm, attack content creators, normal people, companies. Look at Article 13 as an example.

The current social climate will only continue to get worse. Another example would be hate speech laws within the UK.

If advertising generators has some way of making it better for privacy reasons and tried to mitigate the malvertising which is spread through/over ad networks.

~LDogg
 

dabluez98

Level 2
yes so says the 3.3 billion dollar company that provides journalism without integrity. even if they managed to kill adblock, 200 new blocker extensions would emerge in response.
 

Arequire

Level 23
Content Creator
Verified
Alex Springer are wasting their time. All that this does is promote ABP and - once ruled in favour of Eyeo - reinforce the legality of ad blockers.
Publishers should either be looking at ways to monetise ad blocking users or working together to find an alternative solution to online advertising.
 

dabluez98

Level 2
That’s right and in general I think the lack of revenue may be from other reasons too going after ad blockers i am not sure the use or significance in that
 
  • Like
Reactions: mlnevese