francis de lorraine

Level 2
Verified
bonjour j'utilise parfois zemana anti malware premium en conjonction avec mon av principal norton
je fais beaucoup de test en milieu virtualisé grace a sandboxie . Je trouve que la protection en temps réel de zemana est extrêmement faible car quand je fais des test sur des adwares ou pup par exemple elle ne les bloque pas en protection réel mais quand j'analyse avec elle les trouve c'est un exemple ,je pense que si je ne me trompe pas ses analyses recherche plus profondément que sa protection en temps réel ?

---------

Google Translate:


Hello
I sometimes use Zemana Anti-Malware Premium with my main av Norton. I do a lot of testing in virtualized environment, thanks to sandboxie.
I find that the protection in real time of Zemana is extremely weak because when I do tests on adware or pup for example it does not block them in real protection, but when I analyze with it finds them an example. I think that if I am not mistaken his analyzes look deeper than his protection in real time?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

_CyberGhosT_

Level 53
Verified
Trusted
Content Creator
bonjour j'utilise parfois zemana anti malware premium en conjonction avec mon av principal norton
je fais beaucoup de test en milieu virtualisé grace a sandboxie . Je trouve que la protection en temps réel de zemana est extrêmement faible car quand je fais des test sur des adwares ou pup par exemple elle ne les bloque pas en protection réel mais quand j'analyse avec elle les trouve c'est un exemple ,je pense que si je ne me trompe pas ses analyses recherche plus profondément que sa protection en temps réel ?

---------

Google Translate:


Hello
I sometimes use Zemana Anti-Malware Premium with my main av Norton. I do a lot of testing in virtualized environment, thanks to sandboxie.
I find that the protection in real time of Zemana is extremely weak because when I do tests on adware or pup for example it does not block them in real protection, but when I analyze with it finds them an example. I think that if I am not mistaken his analyzes look deeper than his protection in real time?
Hi and welcome :)
Next time post in english, it will save you the wrath of the mods ;)
They are very nice here but know the rules brother. PeAcE
 

Berny

Level 2
Verified
I know the difference between AM and FW/AV protection, and i run full versions of Zemana , Mbam , HitMan Pro on my systems but all of them "on demand" only , I think this is just a personal choice based on experience ...
 
  • Like
Reactions: catjc

HarborFront

Level 46
Verified
Content Creator
What do you mean? Zemaa is an Anti-Malware and Norton is an AV. If you use two kinds of the same security then it can cause infections. However, layered security IS a good idea as long as you know what is what. :)
I thought Zemana AM uses a few top-rated AV engines like BD, ESET, Kaspersky etc? Won't these AV engines clash with Norton's AV in real-time?

Thanks
 
  • Like
Reactions: DJ Panda

XhenEd

Level 27
Verified
Trusted
Content Creator
I thought Zemana AM uses a few top-rated AV engines like BD, ESET, Kaspersky etc? Won't these AV engines clash with Norton's AV in real-time?

Thanks
No. They won't conflict because it's not that all these 3rd party engines are as if they are actually there in the system. What is there is only Norton, and all the 3rd party engines are in the cloud.

Moreover, as far as I know, these 3rd party engines only apply to ZAL/ZAM's on-demand scan. ZAL/ZAM's real time protection uses only their own engines (realtime + Pandora).
 

jamescv7

Level 61
Verified
Trusted
Zemana AM is meant to be companion based so no worries for any current AV installed on the system.

The Antilogger of Zemana has compatibility issues from other products.
 
  • Like
Reactions: venustus and XhenEd