I personally will stick with strict as it barely gives me any problems and because I think that there is a reason why Mozilla is telling us to use the strict profile in order to make dFPI work.
Timothytimes' Security Config 2022
- Thread starter timothytimes
- Start date
Indeed, as I mentioned (or intended) in my follow-up post, since Custom defaults to Private Browsing Mode. There's no clear indication by Mozilla about Custom -> Tracking content ->"In all windows" setting.
Last edited:
Windscribe is a free VPN that I've always used, but Avira Phantom VPN Pro is a paid VPN that I got for free from the giveaway.
FYI, If you've picked up cross-site trackers and you're using the Standard setting, you might see a little icon in Firefox's address bar like in my spoiler here.
What do you think of this comment?
www.wilderssecurity.com
If you think I'm arguing to maintain my point, that's actually not the case (lol). I 'd welcome any clarification about this if it's justified. Actually, I found this topic very intriguing when it first was addressed back in April 2021 on Wilders but nothing's set in stone when it comes to Firefox.
If the Strict setting is the only one to handle this kind of cookie blocking, then good, the discussion can end right there. And frankly, I would not expect someone to deviate from what Moz itself is telling one about this issue (that is: to use the Strict setting). Ultimately, It's not about influencing who does what where in the Settings but seeing an issue from more than one perspective.
I learned the hard way not to block all third party cookies. You just never know and it's a total nuisance to drop whatever you're doing and go rummaging around in the browser to undo this or that setting.
Thanks for bringing up this interesting subject again. Well....at least I find it interesting.
What do you think of this comment?
New Firefox Browser Version Released
OK, this is a little weird but I'm new to the new Firefox and everything. Anyway, I noticed this intriguing icon next to the padlock in the address...
www.wilderssecurity.com
If you think I'm arguing to maintain my point, that's actually not the case (lol). I 'd welcome any clarification about this if it's justified. Actually, I found this topic very intriguing when it first was addressed back in April 2021 on Wilders but nothing's set in stone when it comes to Firefox.
If the Strict setting is the only one to handle this kind of cookie blocking, then good, the discussion can end right there. And frankly, I would not expect someone to deviate from what Moz itself is telling one about this issue (that is: to use the Strict setting). Ultimately, It's not about influencing who does what where in the Settings but seeing an issue from more than one perspective.
I learned the hard way not to block all third party cookies. You just never know and it's a total nuisance to drop whatever you're doing and go rummaging around in the browser to undo this or that setting.
Thanks for bringing up this interesting subject again. Well....at least I find it interesting.
I switched from FS Protection and Simplewall to Kaspersky Standard.
Is your version of kaspersky standard the final version?
This version of Kaspersky Standard is a Technical Release. As I know, the technical release is still only in Russian.
Last edited:
I thought that was the case, I am not sure when the final version will be released everywhere,TR doesn't accept commercial keys as I understand it
Very good config except Avast Anti-track. I can't think of a bigger oxymoron. Maybe Google VPN lol. Really good config tho. I will check out Smart RSS Reader.
No, TR accepts commercial keys. TR is almost a finished product (Этапы выпуска новых версий программ «Лаборатории Касперского»).
I won this product and that's why I use it. I wouldn’t buy this "cool" program for my money.
Kaspersky TR versions accept commercial licences...
So I said it... I denied that it doesn’t accept commercial keys, i.e. TR accepts these keys.
Similar threads
