Advice Request Using HMPA, I assume Trusteer is no longer required?

[GuruNot]

I used to use Trusteer to protect against Banking Malware/Keyloggers. Trusteer

Having recently started evaluating HitmanPro.Alert , I notice that one of the things that HMPA stops is trusteer! :

Mitigation SelfProtection

Platform 10.0.14393/x64 v574 06_3f
PID 2124
Application C:\Program Files (x86)\Mozilla Firefox\firefox.exe
Description Firefox 50.0.2


Code Injection
71AF0000-71AF1000 4KB C:\Program Files (x86)\Trusteer\Rapport\bin\RapportMgmtService.exe [9936]
1 C:\Program Files (x86)\Trusteer\Rapport\bin\RapportMgmtService.exe [9936]
2 C:\Windows\System32\services.exe [612]

Process Trace
1 C:\Program Files (x86)\Mozilla Firefox\firefox.exe [2124]
2 C:\Windows\explorer.exe [6924]
3 C:\Windows\System32\userinit.exe [6700]
4 C:\Windows\System32\winlogon.exe [584]
winlogon.exe

Thumbprint
2814b5ab94e1a1de09774bbe98bd90a6565915b090bc84f38eba3c952d77dc2b

Am I correct in the assumption that HMPA protects against the same exploits (and then some) and provides the same functionality as Trusteer ?

 

[aragornnnn]

HMP.A has more to offer and is better in any way

 

[ster800]

HMPA is a much better product that does not slow down PCs. Trusteer does though have one unique feature in that the banks install a server component that I understand helps validate & secure the sessions with clients (the value of this I don't know).

 

[giants8058]

Try adding Trusteer's executable/s to HMP.alert exclusion list and see if that helps.