Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Other security for Windows, Mac, Linux
Using OS_Armor and Hard_Configurator together
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lenny_Fox" data-source="post: 849252" data-attributes="member: 82776"><p>Thanks for the feedback,</p><p></p><p>OS_Amor has indeed once given problems with a Windows update, but what I understand of the OS_Armor settings it does block execution of legitimate software, AKA the sponsor programs of Hard_Configurator. </p><p></p><p>Blocking execution (as with H_C) could potentially be a higher windows compatibility risk than the execution context based (e.g. parent program, process directory and parsed parameters) as the granular execution block rules of OS_Armor, so there are two sides to look upon this. </p><p></p><p>As long Admins are excluded from the SRP rules, the risk of H_C bogging an Widows update should be near zero.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lenny_Fox, post: 849252, member: 82776"] Thanks for the feedback, OS_Amor has indeed once given problems with a Windows update, but what I understand of the OS_Armor settings it does block execution of legitimate software, AKA the sponsor programs of Hard_Configurator. Blocking execution (as with H_C) could potentially be a higher windows compatibility risk than the execution context based (e.g. parent program, process directory and parsed parameters) as the granular execution block rules of OS_Armor, so there are two sides to look upon this. As long Admins are excluded from the SRP rules, the risk of H_C bogging an Widows update should be near zero. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top