Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Other security for Windows, Mac, Linux
Using OS_Armor and Hard_Configurator together
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lenny_Fox" data-source="post: 849326" data-attributes="member: 82776"><p>[USER=32260]@Andy Ful[/USER]</p><p></p><p>H_C in recommended settings blocks execution (but not for Admins) in user folders, so for software living in Appdata you aso need to create an allow exception. So I am completely missing the point considering the fact that OS-Armor displays a warning with the option to allow. Which makes it easier to create an exception as with H_C.</p><p></p><p>Also the option to block sponsors with H_C is not as granular as with OS-Armor, so the chances of a block with H_C to interfere with some legitimate software is (in theory) bigger than with OS-Armor, so yes they overlap, but the advantage goes to OS-Armor (more granular, context aware execution block extensive internal whitelist AND it throws a warning).</p><p></p><p>I don't want to start a Pro OS_Armor - Against H_C discussion, because I lam glad I am able to use your software for free, so I settle for let's agree to disagree, As confirmed by youm H_C with W_S or AVAST profile does not overlap with OS_Armor, because it does not block executables,</p><p></p><p>Regards Lenny</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lenny_Fox, post: 849326, member: 82776"] [USER=32260]@Andy Ful[/USER] H_C in recommended settings blocks execution (but not for Admins) in user folders, so for software living in Appdata you aso need to create an allow exception. So I am completely missing the point considering the fact that OS-Armor displays a warning with the option to allow. Which makes it easier to create an exception as with H_C. Also the option to block sponsors with H_C is not as granular as with OS-Armor, so the chances of a block with H_C to interfere with some legitimate software is (in theory) bigger than with OS-Armor, so yes they overlap, but the advantage goes to OS-Armor (more granular, context aware execution block extensive internal whitelist AND it throws a warning). I don't want to start a Pro OS_Armor - Against H_C discussion, because I lam glad I am able to use your software for free, so I settle for let's agree to disagree, As confirmed by youm H_C with W_S or AVAST profile does not overlap with OS_Armor, because it does not block executables, Regards Lenny [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top