Stranger said:Waiting for link at wilders where webroot team will explain how they fail again
Stranger said:Waiting for link at wilders where webroot team will explain how they fail again
Stranger said:Waiting for link at wilders where webroot team will explain how they fail again
ZeroDay said:Stranger said:Waiting for link at wilders where webroot team will explain how they fail again
Indeed it seems they have a new excuse for every test. Lol.
yes the invisible shield which only protect you when you get infected by accident .Umbra Corp. said:Stranger said:Waiting for link at wilders where webroot team will explain how they fail again
WSA uses an innovative technology that can't be measured in any test labs :lolz:
Earth said:At least they're accepted in these tests, and results are above 80%.
Stranger said:Waiting for link at wilders where webroot team will explain how they fail again
Stranger said:At least now you can proud of TM
i m agree with u avira is tooooo better from WSAStranger said:I too use av upon my need choice and experience.As fat webroot goes I have got license from Biozfear (Thanks for that) and used it 3-4 months with not big problem however I notice some lag in browsing specially view images so I removed it and now i am with avira.
Earth said:I'm not aware of Webroot guaranteeing 100% detection or any claims like that, and I'm not saying that they have not. As far as I know, the reason you're and most are disappointed is because you assume Webroot (Prevx) runs like any other AV product.
In my opinion, Webroot performed well for something another vendor cannot do.
If you look at the chart:
(Webroot) - 11.2% is user dependent, but a 0.6% compromised.
(AVG) - 4.2% user dependant and 1.2% compromised.
(Avast) - 3.5% user dependant and 1.1% compromised.
(Avira) - 1.5% user dependant and 2.7% compromised.
Webroot has a lower compromised rate than 3 AVs that show to detect over 90% of the threats.
Detections rate don't mean squat, that 11.2% is the difference between a clean and infected PC. It's the User infront of the PC who is at fault, not the product. So no, I don't believe Webroot have failed this or that, or any other tests.
Again, I don't take these results to heart.