- Feb 13, 2017
- 737
I don't even think Voodoosheild Pro is even needed IMO. Kaspersky is a good product but really expensive. Windows Defender may not have the greatest detection but it still is an overall good product.
Chose Win Defender + Voodoosheild
I don't even think Voodoosheild Pro is even needed IMO. Kaspersky is a good product but really expensive. Windows Defender may not have the greatest detection but it still is an overall good product.
Chose Win Defender + Voodoosheild
Windows Defender + Voodooshield free or pro
Cheaper but still great configuration.
I'm not concerned about price right now (have a free Kaspersky license), but that's an important factor for sure
I understand completely. I have licenses to run Bitdefender Total Security for a year but after I found out how good Voodooshield is, I just said "oh well" to Bitdefender. IF I had any doubt as to the efficacy of VS, I would tack on Comodo Firewall using @cruelsister settings. Possibly a touch over kill, but I could sleep at night knowing that I wouldn't have to worry about pretty much anything. Guaranteed 100%... likely not. But close enough that I am content.
Oh no doubt! Kaspersky from all I know is amazing! However I guess for me... at least when it came to BTS, did I need ALL the extra things it came with? Useful, sure. But did I need all of that, when Windows Defender (already on the system), and Voodooshield (small, lightweight) and free, or ~$20 a year for Pro which really is not that necessary unless you really want to tweak it up.Yeah I am in a position kinda like you. Voodoshield is absolutely amazing, but am I gonna say no to one of the best AVs in the world? Tough question
Oh no doubt! Kaspersky from all I know is amazing! However I guess for me... at least when it came to BTS, did I need ALL the extra things it came with? Useful, sure. But did I need all of that, when Windows Defender (already on the system), and Voodooshield (small, lightweight) and free, or ~$20 a year for Pro which really is not that necessary unless you really want to tweak it up.
Honestly, the simplicity, and lightweight combo is what wins me over. And even if VS Pro is desired, I believe it is still a cheaper deal.
Again, this is NOT a reflection on the performance of Kaspersky. I just think THAT much of a program is just not needed.
You make hard questions !
I have Kapersky license and i like a lot Kaspersky and its tweaking ability to get most of it. But, hmm... WD + VS is solid combo also, actually enough for sure what i have been lurking your post's u know what your doing pretty much, so if i was you i go with that. ,,,Or keep Kaspesrky as long you have license and then shift WD + VS. VS is so great program and dev Dan is Great guy and keep his "children" good attend for it.
Kaspersky Internet Security, because it has better detection rates, it is simply the best option(in my opinion)