Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Security Statistics and Reports
AV-Comparatives Performance Test - April 2024
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CyberDevil" data-source="post: 1085648" data-attributes="member: 91290"><p>Of course, I am too lazy to check these tests on my hardware, but I often feel that they draw these diagrams according to some special principles. How did Panda, which has not received updates for many years and worked fine even on Intel Celerom, become so heavy? How did the almost pure cloud-based Norton, which flies on my Intel Atom, which is already ten years old in the middle of the list? How did Eset, one of the lightest non-cloud programs, suddenly become so much heavier, when the only new features that have appeared in it in recent years are a dark interface theme and quic scanning? (yes, Eset has become very heavy on the machine during on-demand scanning in the latest version, but that's another case). How can Kaspersky with App and resource control be one of the easiest? Do they think total system control comes for free? The only thing I believe there is the new McAfee result.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CyberDevil, post: 1085648, member: 91290"] Of course, I am too lazy to check these tests on my hardware, but I often feel that they draw these diagrams according to some special principles. How did Panda, which has not received updates for many years and worked fine even on Intel Celerom, become so heavy? How did the almost pure cloud-based Norton, which flies on my Intel Atom, which is already ten years old in the middle of the list? How did Eset, one of the lightest non-cloud programs, suddenly become so much heavier, when the only new features that have appeared in it in recent years are a dark interface theme and quic scanning? (yes, Eset has become very heavy on the machine during on-demand scanning in the latest version, but that's another case). How can Kaspersky with App and resource control be one of the easiest? Do they think total system control comes for free? The only thing I believe there is the new McAfee result. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top