Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Of LoLBins, 0-Days, ESET, and Microsoft Defender
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Trident" data-source="post: 1083503" data-attributes="member: 99014"><p>Whilst some of these can be blocked completely from execution as they are not needed, others can be monitored more strictly for behavioural patterns. For example, MS Access or Outlook are not expected to create executables not signed by Microsoft (or if the updater is actually a separate process, haven’t checked recently, they shouldn’t be creating any).</p><p></p><p>Anomaly detection is necessary for these.</p><p></p><p>The Certutil for majority of home users brings very little value.</p><p>You can’t fault a vendor who decided to block them (people can always create exceptions) and you can’t fault a vendor who decided not to block them — as long as they still provide acceptable protection via other means.</p><p></p><p>I personally prefer these blocked and if the solution doesn’t do it, I will do it myself.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Trident, post: 1083503, member: 99014"] Whilst some of these can be blocked completely from execution as they are not needed, others can be monitored more strictly for behavioural patterns. For example, MS Access or Outlook are not expected to create executables not signed by Microsoft (or if the updater is actually a separate process, haven’t checked recently, they shouldn’t be creating any). Anomaly detection is necessary for these. The Certutil for majority of home users brings very little value. You can’t fault a vendor who decided to block them (people can always create exceptions) and you can’t fault a vendor who decided not to block them — as long as they still provide acceptable protection via other means. I personally prefer these blocked and if the solution doesn’t do it, I will do it myself. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top