Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
1,000 Malware Sample Pre-Execution Efficacy Test - Malware Test
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 2913" data-source="post: 518726"><p>DardiM,</p><p></p><p>I mentioned your test to VS Dev.</p><p></p><p>His reply -</p><p>"Simple, here is a good example... please look at sample # 9 out of 1000 at 39:41 in the video (which I have already discussed on the wilders VoodooShield? thread). The blacklist false positive adjusted the composite VoodooAi score to 0.3608, which is just over 0.3333... the threshold for VoodooAi to allow an item when VS is on AutoPilot.</p><p></p><p>There are probably 4-5 samples that are similar to this, but there will be a logical explanation for them too.</p><p></p><p>Remember, VS has different thresholds depending on the mode, so if you test in a different mode, then you might receive a different result.</p><p></p><p>But that is why I always recommend people test with the stand alone version of VoodooAi, if they are interested in seeing how VoodooAi performs on its own. That is actually the main reason why I created the stand alone version... so people can test the efficacy of only VoodooAi, so they know there is no funny business going on with the blacklist scan. Fire up fiddler and test until your heart is content <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite110" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" />.</p><p></p><p>It will not be an issue either way now, since you can disable both the blacklist scan and VoodooAi, and you can test however you like".</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Deleted member 2913, post: 518726"] DardiM, I mentioned your test to VS Dev. His reply - "Simple, here is a good example... please look at sample # 9 out of 1000 at 39:41 in the video (which I have already discussed on the wilders VoodooShield? thread). The blacklist false positive adjusted the composite VoodooAi score to 0.3608, which is just over 0.3333... the threshold for VoodooAi to allow an item when VS is on AutoPilot. There are probably 4-5 samples that are similar to this, but there will be a logical explanation for them too. Remember, VS has different thresholds depending on the mode, so if you test in a different mode, then you might receive a different result. But that is why I always recommend people test with the stand alone version of VoodooAi, if they are interested in seeing how VoodooAi performs on its own. That is actually the main reason why I created the stand alone version... so people can test the efficacy of only VoodooAi, so they know there is no funny business going on with the blacklist scan. Fire up fiddler and test until your heart is content ;). It will not be an issue either way now, since you can disable both the blacklist scan and VoodooAi, and you can test however you like". [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top