Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="brambedkar59" data-source="post: 1065450" data-attributes="member: 61084">Not at all, I have no reason to believe that. I saw the latest test results (Sept 2023) on your website &amp; just found it funny, like what are the odds that all 15 products tested gave 100% detection result out of 343 malwares tested. I was in no way suggesting that you intentionally faked/cheated the results. I saw older test results and saw that products do actually fail often, September 2023 test was the only one where every product got 100%, last time this happened was in <a href="https://avlab.pl/en/results-november-2022/" target="_blank">Nov 2022</a>. That would be pointless &amp; unnecessary cause I am not questioning your methodology, that would be stupid of me because it&#039;s not my field of expertise. That would be like you questioning me about my RCC beam design.I was replying to a member who posted results from avlab and my other comment was to a different member about AV-C. It was a not a comparison b/w these two results. My post about avlab was only for light humor, I joke a lot if you saw me on the forum before. I apologize if my post seemed to imply anything bad about avlab, that was not my intention. I appreciate developers/officials from other organizations/groups interacting here with us on MT.Cheers!</blockquote>

[QUOTE="brambedkar59, post: 1065450, member: 61084"] Not at all, I have no reason to believe that. I saw the latest test results (Sept 2023) on your website & just found it funny, like what are the odds that all 15 products tested gave 100% detection result out of 343 malwares tested. I was in no way suggesting that you intentionally faked/cheated the results. I saw older test results and saw that products do actually fail often, September 2023 test was the only one where every product got 100%, last time this happened was in [URL='https://avlab.pl/en/results-november-2022/']Nov 2022[/URL]. That would be pointless & unnecessary cause I am not questioning your methodology, that would be stupid of me because it's not my field of expertise. That would be like you questioning me about my RCC beam design. I was replying to a member who posted results from avlab and my other comment was to a different member about AV-C. It was a not a comparison b/w these two results. My post about avlab was only for light humor, I joke a lot if you saw me on the forum before. I apologize if my post seemed to imply anything bad about avlab, that was not my intention. I appreciate developers/officials from other organizations/groups interacting here with us on MT. Cheers! [/QUOTE]

Verification