Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Guides - Privacy & Security Tips
BoraMurdar's Fix Tools
Message
<blockquote data-quote="kiric96" data-source="post: 340333" data-attributes="member: 24853"><p>i agree with bora murdar, our friends at Dr. web <a href="https://vms.drweb.com/myths/" target="_blank">writes:</a></p><p>[SPOILER]Each anti-virus program has its own unique concept of building anti-virus protection. Dr.Web does not cure viruses in archives, but this does not decrease the level of protection it provides compared to similar programs on the market. Dr.Web perfectly detects viruses in archives and, with SpIDer Guard constantly enabled, such viruses have no chance of getting outside the infected archive to infect a system. Moreover it’s unlikely that any anti-virus can boast that it cures all of the viruses it detects in an infected archive! To "cure” archives one must not just cure (or remove) the infected file inside the archive, one must repack the archive to make its contents accessible again to the user. In most cases such repacking is impossible without licenses to the archiving algorithm. If an anti-virus developer claims to be able to cure archives, ask to see all of his licenses[/SPOILER]</p><p></p><p>i think that now a days we see less real viruses infections, today malware are trojans, worms and so on, however i manage myself to run and clean rootkit-virus infected machines with EEK and some other tools for me Kaspersky rescue is a heavy tool in terms of portability and usability</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="kiric96, post: 340333, member: 24853"] i agree with bora murdar, our friends at Dr. web [URL='https://vms.drweb.com/myths/']writes:[/URL] [SPOILER]Each anti-virus program has its own unique concept of building anti-virus protection. Dr.Web does not cure viruses in archives, but this does not decrease the level of protection it provides compared to similar programs on the market. Dr.Web perfectly detects viruses in archives and, with SpIDer Guard constantly enabled, such viruses have no chance of getting outside the infected archive to infect a system. Moreover it’s unlikely that any anti-virus can boast that it cures all of the viruses it detects in an infected archive! To "cure” archives one must not just cure (or remove) the infected file inside the archive, one must repack the archive to make its contents accessible again to the user. In most cases such repacking is impossible without licenses to the archiving algorithm. If an anti-virus developer claims to be able to cure archives, ask to see all of his licenses[/SPOILER] i think that now a days we see less real viruses infections, today malware are trojans, worms and so on, however i manage myself to run and clean rootkit-virus infected machines with EEK and some other tools for me Kaspersky rescue is a heavy tool in terms of portability and usability [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top