Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 2913" data-source="post: 521056">Sophos Home - Free - Decent protectionCylance Home - Paid - Costly - No User ControlVoodooShield - Free/Paid - Blacklist Scan (VT) + Excellent VoodooAi + Different Modes, Excellent Protection - My VoteI am waiting for final release of VoodooShield.But I do try VoodooShield BetasI have Pro version.Whenever I try VS Betas, I test VAi sensitivity levels @ Default 100, @ 90 &amp; @ Lowest Level Reckless.VAi default sensitivity level is @ 100Have you tested VAi sensitivity level @ Reckless i.e Lowest?I kinda like VAi @ RecklessI have compared VAi @ 100 i.e Default &amp; @ Reckless i.e LowestI have noticed that programs detected as Unsafe @ 100 are detected as Unsafe @ Reckless too (VAi scores are different but verdict Unsafe)I have noticed that most programs with Suspicious verdict @ 100 are allowed @ Reckless i.e no Suspicious verdict. And VAi Suspicious verdict is little sensitive.So I find @ Reckless too provides good protection i.e programs with Unsafe verdict @ 100 are detected as Unsafe @ Reckless too. And most programs with Suspicious (Sensitive) verdict @ 100 are allowed @ Reckless i.e no Suspicious verdict. So @ Reckless kinda provides good protection with good usability/less FPs/less Sensitive Suspicious verdict.But my little test was with couple harmless samples &amp; programs I use.I wonder how VAi @ Reckless will perform against malware? I really would like to see VAi @ Reckless against malware. I think would be interesting.Anyone would like to test VAi @ Reckless against malware Or comparison test @ Default 100 &amp; @ Reckless i.e Lowest?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Deleted member 2913, post: 521056"] Sophos Home - Free - Decent protection Cylance Home - Paid - Costly - No User Control VoodooShield - Free/Paid - Blacklist Scan (VT) + Excellent VoodooAi + Different Modes, Excellent Protection - My Vote I am waiting for final release of VoodooShield. But I do try VoodooShield Betas I have Pro version. Whenever I try VS Betas, I test VAi sensitivity levels @ Default 100, @ 90 & @ Lowest Level Reckless. VAi default sensitivity level is @ 100 Have you tested VAi sensitivity level @ Reckless i.e Lowest? I kinda like VAi @ Reckless I have compared VAi @ 100 i.e Default & @ Reckless i.e Lowest I have noticed that programs detected as Unsafe @ 100 are detected as Unsafe @ Reckless too (VAi scores are different but verdict Unsafe) I have noticed that most programs with Suspicious verdict @ 100 are allowed @ Reckless i.e no Suspicious verdict. And VAi Suspicious verdict is little sensitive. So I find @ Reckless too provides good protection i.e programs with Unsafe verdict @ 100 are detected as Unsafe @ Reckless too. And most programs with Suspicious (Sensitive) verdict @ 100 are allowed @ Reckless i.e no Suspicious verdict. So @ Reckless kinda provides good protection with good usability/less FPs/less Sensitive Suspicious verdict. But my little test was with couple harmless samples & programs I use. I wonder how VAi @ Reckless will perform against malware? I really would like to see VAi @ Reckless against malware. I think would be interesting. Anyone would like to test VAi @ Reckless against malware Or comparison test @ Default 100 & @ Reckless i.e Lowest? [/QUOTE]

Verification