Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Comodo Cloud AV - Autosandbox only - petya bypassed
Message
<blockquote data-quote="cruelsister" data-source="post: 590570" data-attributes="member: 7463"><p>I don't know if anyone has brought this up before, but there is a great deal of difference in how CCAV and CF/CIS is coded with respect to efficiency.</p><p></p><p>As some may know about VM's , a person can dictate how much recourses are utilized by the virtual environment. Whenever I test a new product I will vary the amount of resources used by the VM, going from Real Fast PC down to Really Crappy POS PC. With CF (and CIS to a similar but slightly lesser extent), it is as Light as a Feather and Quick as a Bunny across the board; with CCAV the lower settings make the product onerous to use, and at the lowest setting simply intolerable.</p><p></p><p>I infer from this that (and I may be totally incorrect) there has to be two separate development teams, on for the CF/CIS products and another for CCAV. So just as the elegance of the coding varies, so can the efficiency of the Sandbox (plus, as everyone knows that Comodo's AV leaves a great deal to be desired, Why Oh Why would anyone use something that highlights it?).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="cruelsister, post: 590570, member: 7463"] I don't know if anyone has brought this up before, but there is a great deal of difference in how CCAV and CF/CIS is coded with respect to efficiency. As some may know about VM's , a person can dictate how much recourses are utilized by the virtual environment. Whenever I test a new product I will vary the amount of resources used by the VM, going from Real Fast PC down to Really Crappy POS PC. With CF (and CIS to a similar but slightly lesser extent), it is as Light as a Feather and Quick as a Bunny across the board; with CCAV the lower settings make the product onerous to use, and at the lowest setting simply intolerable. I infer from this that (and I may be totally incorrect) there has to be two separate development teams, on for the CF/CIS products and another for CCAV. So just as the elegance of the coding varies, so can the efficiency of the Sandbox (plus, as everyone knows that Comodo's AV leaves a great deal to be desired, Why Oh Why would anyone use something that highlights it?). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top