Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Comodo Firewall 10 Setup
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Decopi" data-source="post: 684739" data-attributes="member: 67091"><p>Thank you [USER=58988]@Telos[/USER] for your answer.</p><p></p><p>I read many commentaries where [USER=7463]@cruelsister[/USER] mentioned that this CF settings should be enough.</p><p>But I also read many CF veteran users, sharing lots of worries in other commentaries.</p><p></p><p>As a zero knowledge CF user, I have my own doubts and worries.</p><p>As I mentioned, I am just doing a test, I want to continue my test, and I still want help.</p><p></p><p>So I repeat my post:</p><p></p><p>I'm trying to find a freeware security combo (Antivirus + Firewall), with the best "low system impact" and "maximum protection" possible relation.</p><p>Today, I am testing Avast Antivirus Free (AF) + Comodo Firewall Free (CF).</p><p>This is my first time with CF. I watched [USER=7463]@cruelsister[/USER] video, and followed his settings.</p><p></p><p>Please, my questions are:</p><p></p><p>1) The AF sandbox ("Virus Chest") supposes to have the same function as "Auto-Containment" in CF. In this case, are [USER=7463]@cruelsister[/USER] settings redundant?</p><p></p><p>2) I understand that certain level of redundancy, is always welcome. But, let's say that AF is enough against virus, malware, exploits, ransomware etc. In this case, and focusing at CF just as a plain firewall, what could be CF best settings to work along with AF?</p><p></p><p>3) CF has options like "Web Site Filtering" or "ViruScope" etc. It seems to me a kind of redundancy with AF (with potential interference). May I disable "Web Site Filtering" and "ViruScope"? What else can I disable in CF to work with AF without redundancy?</p><p></p><p>Thanks a lot!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Decopi, post: 684739, member: 67091"] Thank you [USER=58988]@Telos[/USER] for your answer. I read many commentaries where [USER=7463]@cruelsister[/USER] mentioned that this CF settings should be enough. But I also read many CF veteran users, sharing lots of worries in other commentaries. As a zero knowledge CF user, I have my own doubts and worries. As I mentioned, I am just doing a test, I want to continue my test, and I still want help. So I repeat my post: I'm trying to find a freeware security combo (Antivirus + Firewall), with the best "low system impact" and "maximum protection" possible relation. Today, I am testing Avast Antivirus Free (AF) + Comodo Firewall Free (CF). This is my first time with CF. I watched [USER=7463]@cruelsister[/USER] video, and followed his settings. Please, my questions are: 1) The AF sandbox ("Virus Chest") supposes to have the same function as "Auto-Containment" in CF. In this case, are [USER=7463]@cruelsister[/USER] settings redundant? 2) I understand that certain level of redundancy, is always welcome. But, let's say that AF is enough against virus, malware, exploits, ransomware etc. In this case, and focusing at CF just as a plain firewall, what could be CF best settings to work along with AF? 3) CF has options like "Web Site Filtering" or "ViruScope" etc. It seems to me a kind of redundancy with AF (with potential interference). May I disable "Web Site Filtering" and "ViruScope"? What else can I disable in CF to work with AF without redundancy? Thanks a lot! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top