Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Comodo Firewall vs a test Keylogger
Message
<blockquote data-quote="cruelsister" data-source="post: 422930" data-attributes="member: 7463"><p>A couple of things:</p><p></p><p>1). I was using this particular keylogger as a surrogate for that type of malware that need Internet access to do their particular damage (RAT's data stealers of diverse type, etc). So stating that Product A or B would stop a keylogger really isn't all that applicable (an anti-logger can stop at keylogger but ignores a RAT).</p><p></p><p>2). If possible I have a lower regard for Anti-exe's than I do AV's. I have to do a video to demonstrate why, and until then I'll refrain from commenting.</p><p></p><p>3). Moose- Forget about Kompass. As script based malware can be easily messed with to evade AV's (even very poor ones such as Kompass), definition based protection isn't of much use.</p><p></p><p>4). Deep down, the strength of the Comodo Sandbox is the extensive white list for which they get very little (if any) credit. The theory being that taking as much decision making out of the hands of the user is a good thing (I agree). Certainly not as robust or elegant as an Enterprise Sandbox with real time forensics, it also doesn't cost 60,000USD.</p><p></p><p>5). If I ever use/suggest Default settings, please kill me.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="cruelsister, post: 422930, member: 7463"] A couple of things: 1). I was using this particular keylogger as a surrogate for that type of malware that need Internet access to do their particular damage (RAT's data stealers of diverse type, etc). So stating that Product A or B would stop a keylogger really isn't all that applicable (an anti-logger can stop at keylogger but ignores a RAT). 2). If possible I have a lower regard for Anti-exe's than I do AV's. I have to do a video to demonstrate why, and until then I'll refrain from commenting. 3). Moose- Forget about Kompass. As script based malware can be easily messed with to evade AV's (even very poor ones such as Kompass), definition based protection isn't of much use. 4). Deep down, the strength of the Comodo Sandbox is the extensive white list for which they get very little (if any) credit. The theory being that taking as much decision making out of the hands of the user is a good thing (I agree). Certainly not as robust or elegant as an Enterprise Sandbox with real time forensics, it also doesn't cost 60,000USD. 5). If I ever use/suggest Default settings, please kill me. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top