Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
[Detection test] Malwarebytes vs Zemana vs HitmanPro vs SecureAPlus 2016
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Wave" data-source="post: 579773"><p>You can still compare it depending on the type of test. If you are performing a static scanning test then you can compare the static detection results (e.g. on-demand scanning for a folder containing malicious samples), however with dynamic testing then it may not work properly due to the comparison of protection components for dynamic protection (like you said, Malwarebytes Anti-Malware has much more).</p><p></p><p>It also needs to be taken into account that Malwarebytes do not use other peoples engines, but only their in-house engine, which is much trickier to do... Less research, less resources, harder maintenance (keep up with new malicious techniques, etc.). They aren't that bad, but they are not as good as their image makes out, either.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Wave, post: 579773"] You can still compare it depending on the type of test. If you are performing a static scanning test then you can compare the static detection results (e.g. on-demand scanning for a folder containing malicious samples), however with dynamic testing then it may not work properly due to the comparison of protection components for dynamic protection (like you said, Malwarebytes Anti-Malware has much more). It also needs to be taken into account that Malwarebytes do not use other peoples engines, but only their in-house engine, which is much trickier to do... Less research, less resources, harder maintenance (keep up with new malicious techniques, etc.). They aren't that bad, but they are not as good as their image makes out, either. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top