Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Norton Security Suite BETA Test (MalwareDoctor)
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Nico@FMA" data-source="post: 232341" data-attributes="member: 8154"><p>I stand correct i was reading you said it is a resource hog while you said it "was".</p><p>That said i do not blame people but you have to be pretty stupid & braindeath if your AV is telling you that a URL is malicious and its trying to download a file and yet you still click "Yes download anyway" considering the fact that by clicking on it you actually white list the executable for a part within the Norton protection and yet you wonder why Norton fails to protect you.</p><p>Fact is Norton did protect you and did stop the danger IF you would have followed up on the advise given by them.</p><p>I am aware of the forum posts even on Norton community itself about users complaining about problems, and yes some might be IT guys so what?</p><p>But call me ANY community related to Internet security where this is not the case.</p><p>Please point out a brand to me that has never been criticized? And yet 99% of all the forum posts regarding the issues find their origin in the user his/her own action. As has been proven so many times.</p><p>For example look at our own malware removal help section here on MT.</p><p>Just read the logs and you will see as longs do not lie that 95% is NOT a AV failing but its a USER based error who failed to "understand" and use their product properly. And yes Norton uses multiple modules to achieve a good protection as its build in such way so whats the problem if it relies on additional modules? Norton is certainly not the only one doing so...</p><p></p><p>My point here is that your lack of understanding has become painfully clear and yet you point out my nature.</p><p></p><p>I am totally cool with your opinions and i am totally cool with what you think.</p><p>I have made a solid effort explaining you how things work based on facts and yet you ignore it and reply with bias info.</p><p>And then you there to say: "<em>i have no problem about ur nature hehehe</em>"</p><p>Fine what ever makes you feel happy...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Nico@FMA, post: 232341, member: 8154"] I stand correct i was reading you said it is a resource hog while you said it "was". That said i do not blame people but you have to be pretty stupid & braindeath if your AV is telling you that a URL is malicious and its trying to download a file and yet you still click "Yes download anyway" considering the fact that by clicking on it you actually white list the executable for a part within the Norton protection and yet you wonder why Norton fails to protect you. Fact is Norton did protect you and did stop the danger IF you would have followed up on the advise given by them. I am aware of the forum posts even on Norton community itself about users complaining about problems, and yes some might be IT guys so what? But call me ANY community related to Internet security where this is not the case. Please point out a brand to me that has never been criticized? And yet 99% of all the forum posts regarding the issues find their origin in the user his/her own action. As has been proven so many times. For example look at our own malware removal help section here on MT. Just read the logs and you will see as longs do not lie that 95% is NOT a AV failing but its a USER based error who failed to "understand" and use their product properly. And yes Norton uses multiple modules to achieve a good protection as its build in such way so whats the problem if it relies on additional modules? Norton is certainly not the only one doing so... My point here is that your lack of understanding has become painfully clear and yet you point out my nature. I am totally cool with your opinions and i am totally cool with what you think. I have made a solid effort explaining you how things work based on facts and yet you ignore it and reply with bias info. And then you there to say: "[I]i have no problem about ur nature hehehe[/I]" Fine what ever makes you feel happy... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top