Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Of LoLBins, 0 Days, and ESET (Part 2)
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ForgottenSeer 109138" data-source="post: 1084051"><p>It is not real world. The file needs to be download as stated above for the products to scan for indicators, unless it was as you just suggested from an inserted flashdrive of which again habits like disabling autoruns of those type devices and scans of files on them before using once inserted can negate. </p><p></p><p>A Lot of trivial "could be's" inserted in this thread when all the "professionals" should be fully aware this tests is not accurately testing the "design," of products. Phishing requires user interaction but still comes from some point. </p><p></p><p>Lottery odds of infection do not mean the product is incapable either as none are guaranteed 100 detection at all times, I'm aware. </p><p></p><p>If users intend to "test" products capabilities then these half way attempts are not enough, it needs to be done again according to design, as stated before if it misses then, it's not from inaccurate testing, but the product.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ForgottenSeer 109138, post: 1084051"] It is not real world. The file needs to be download as stated above for the products to scan for indicators, unless it was as you just suggested from an inserted flashdrive of which again habits like disabling autoruns of those type devices and scans of files on them before using once inserted can negate. A Lot of trivial "could be's" inserted in this thread when all the "professionals" should be fully aware this tests is not accurately testing the "design," of products. Phishing requires user interaction but still comes from some point. Lottery odds of infection do not mean the product is incapable either as none are guaranteed 100 detection at all times, I'm aware. If users intend to "test" products capabilities then these half way attempts are not enough, it needs to be done again according to design, as stated before if it misses then, it's not from inaccurate testing, but the product. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top