Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Symantec Endpoint Protection 2014 (Manzaitest)
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rahadian Putra" data-source="post: 264913" data-attributes="member: 18509"><p>I appreciate the test as always, but this time I must disagree, I'm sorry <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite111" alt=":(" title="Frown :(" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":(" /></p><p>SEP was built for company and they has huge reason why this software not released for home users. SEP is not a simple antivirus, not a simple internet security, it's an excellent protection for <strong>Network</strong> with many features etc, but...in order to make SEP run properly, users cannot run it under default settings jut like when it installed, its quite different than other Norton's product for home users, if not configured properly, then SEP will simply fail. It will requires a manual book to read and understanding the whole features in SEP and manual configuration. And since you also said and admitted by your self by saying "prefer Norton Internet Security which is more efficient" it is true...then how in the world this Norton's product gave different results? especially since this was built for company? it should provide better result, the answer is : because it's not a simple internet security.</p><p></p><p>Both N.Nvt and Umbra can provide more details and explanation, especially N.Nvt since he's using SEP for a long time, also keep in mind running SEP under managed client and unmanaged client could also provide different protection, thus...the results as well. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite109" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rahadian Putra, post: 264913, member: 18509"] I appreciate the test as always, but this time I must disagree, I'm sorry :( SEP was built for company and they has huge reason why this software not released for home users. SEP is not a simple antivirus, not a simple internet security, it's an excellent protection for [B]Network[/B] with many features etc, but...in order to make SEP run properly, users cannot run it under default settings jut like when it installed, its quite different than other Norton's product for home users, if not configured properly, then SEP will simply fail. It will requires a manual book to read and understanding the whole features in SEP and manual configuration. And since you also said and admitted by your self by saying "prefer Norton Internet Security which is more efficient" it is true...then how in the world this Norton's product gave different results? especially since this was built for company? it should provide better result, the answer is : because it's not a simple internet security. Both N.Nvt and Umbra can provide more details and explanation, especially N.Nvt since he's using SEP for a long time, also keep in mind running SEP under managed client and unmanaged client could also provide different protection, thus...the results as well. :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top