F
ForgottenSeer 97327
When I look at the logger of uBlockOrigin, I see no scripts running, while the result page tells me ads.js, pagead.js and partner.ads.js are running, so I would not waist any energy in trying to get a better score
it's very difficult to have a clean sheet on those websites but I know many people would see tons of adsNo animated gifs whatsoever. Looks like a normal site to me...
it might enable ABPVN filter and that will block these website specificallyWith Adguard disabled:
View attachment 273304
Adguard Enabled:
View attachment 273305
Adguard seems to be doing a good job.
I don't buy into any of these tests. The best test is how web pages appear to individual users. Everyone's browsing habits are different. The tests have extremely limited value and many unkowns , e.g. coding, methodology, etc.The test was flawed according to makers of uBlock Origin and AdGuard.
I don't know of anything has changed with the new test.
There is a FAQ and a Compatibility Check on the main page:
Adding his filter in uBlock Origin gives me 100%, but adding his filter in AdGuard for Android only gives 77%.Test Ad Block - Toolz
Looking for an easy way to check the efficiency of your ad blocker?Toolz offers a simple and beautiful design test that allows you to quickly and easily test the performance of current ad/content blocker solution. Intuitive interface makes it easy to navigate and use, and the beautiful design...d3ward.github.io
Just add the VIE block filter at the very bottom of the uBO filter config page.Even µBO Hard mode can't stop that junk. I felt like I was on LSD looking at that site!
I tend to agree. We can get things so dialed in and so tight, that we may lose the functionality and even fun? of a webpage and may end up in doing too much fiddling around with unblocking, allowing settings etc. But still, it is kinda fun to see what does what, and what others are getting I'm enjoying this threadI don't buy into any of these tests. The best test is how web pages appear to individual users. Everyone's browsing habits are different. The tests have extremely limited value and many unkowns , e.g. coding, methodology, etc.
To some extent, this supports my point above.
microsoft edge Without any extension but in Settings:
And of course, we really don't know what the experiment entails, if or when it's active, i.e. doing anything, or what type of imrovement it provides. Thanks as usual to MS lack of documentation.And from flags:
Like @Oerlink said: Just add the VIE block filter at the very bottom of the uBO filter config page.Edge (balanced), ublock, ddg, privacy badger, F-Secure 19.0, Mullvad. 100% but the site @Evjl's Rain suggested is full of ads, gifs mentioned I assume.
View attachment 273310
Adguard desktop on default settings is best you can get, no need to add any filters to be honest. Dont believe test resultsWell, that didn't go to plan. Using Adguard windows client and microsoft edge I managed a massive 8% lol
Totally agree with you. And they allow users to disable the telemetry, etc. This is why @upnorth uses it and tracks their releases on the forum.It doesn't take away that Ghostery does a remarkable job in ad- and trackerblocking. View Adblocking innovation
thanks, but prominent brain fog prevails today, I re-read the posts, went into ubo filter config gearing up for the weekend -- I'm not seeing VIE block filter. me I'm sure...Like @Oerlink said: Just add the VIE block filter at the very bottom of the uBO filter config page.
thanks, but prominent brain fog prevails today, I re-read the posts, went into ubo filter config gearing up for the weekend -- I'm not seeing VIE block filter. me I'm sure...