- Mar 13, 2021
- 426
He was just referring to benchmark scores, which for gaming translates to fps. It's just inferior performance, not exactly issues.@blackice was definitely talking about issues related to core isolation
Last edited:
He was just referring to benchmark scores, which for gaming translates to fps. It's just inferior performance, not exactly issues.@blackice was definitely talking about issues related to core isolation
I did have issues with one program when I tried it. Something with a low level driver, but I don’t remember what. But yes, ultimately my problem was performance.He was just referring to benchmark scores, which for gaming translates to fps. It's just inferior performance, not exactly issues.
Windows provides choice and control for users to configure their PCs to meet their specific needs, including the ability to turn Windows features like Memory Integrity and VMP on and off. Gamers who want to prioritize performance have the option to turn off these features while gaming and turn them back on when finished playing. However, if turned off, the device may be vulnerable to threats.
It does not protect well against zero hour malware,
and fails utterly against banking trojans
Anything beyond normal attacks and it is more probable that Microsoft Defender will fail to protect a system. This is confirmed by testing by MRG Effitas and AVLab.
Most users are not going to employ a utility to tweak Microsoft Defender so the rationale, at least for Windows Home, is to test Defender at 100% defaults.
I think so.Is MD a decent baseline when considering security from a general perspective? Sure it is. Is it good enough? That depends to a large extent upon the person using the system.