TRIM isn't run automatically on windows...
Sure it is. Since Windows 7, TRIM is enabled automatically on any drive Windows detects as solid state.
How to Check if TRIM Is Enabled for Your SSD (and Enable It if It Isn’t)
Windows 7 and above are set to automatically enable TRIM on solid-state drives.
I will never ever use SSD, unless forced to. SSD does not improve performance, just loading times. I will rather short-stroke HDD. I do not like an experimental hardware, like Ryzen. CRT was also replaced with LCD, because it is more convenient, but worse quality than CRT and destroys eyes.
Wow! BoraMurdar is right. There is so much incorrect information in there.
SSDs can make a huge difference in overall performance. My main laptop, which has many hundreds of programs installed, boots to the Windows 10 login screen, in around 5 to 10 seconds.
Right!
And as
anyone who has migrated to SSDs knows, SSDs do indeed improve much more than "just loading times". Simple common sense tells you operating systems are very disk intensive - constantly opening files, saving temp files, accessing the Registry and the Page File and so much more. Because all those tasks complete much faster with SSDs, system resources much more quickly become available for other tasks - which of course, improves over all performance. Speaking of the Page File, there can be no better place to put the Page File. SSDs are ideally suited for Page Files. See
Support and Q&A for Solid-State Drives and scroll down to, "
Frequently Asked Questions, Should the pagefile be placed on SSDs?"
Yes, SSDs still cost more, but SSDs consume less power, take up less space, weigh less, generate less heat, make no noise, and with no moving parts, have a longer life expectancy than mechanical hard drives. And because there are no moving parts, SSDs are less susceptible to damage from accidental knocks and drops. If the budget allows, SSD all the way is the only way to go.
Ryzen is experimental? Yeah right. You could say that for the first generation of any new processor - regardless if from AMD, Intel, NVIDIA, Qualcomm, Motorola, or any of the other makers in the world. But of course, the second generation Ryzens are already out.
LCD monitors replaced the CRT because LCD monitors consume much less energy, generate much less heat, weigh much less, take up much less desk real estate, and they cost less. And while the image quality of the first generation LCDs could be beat by the better CRTs, today's LCDs are much better than CRTs. And as far as being bad for the eyes, do some homework! CRTs are, and always have been worse for your eyes! They not only emit ionizing radiation, but UV light too.
The "truth" is, sitting in front of any TV/monitor screen for too long is bad on your eyes.