Mini Spy

Loading...
 
  1. HitmanPro CHRISTMAS GIVEAWAY: REVO UNINSTALLER PRO GIVEAWAY

    Get a free license key for Revo Uninstaller Pro. We are giving away free Revo Uninstaller Pro keys for our awesome members!

    (LIVE) Get now a Revo Uninstaller Pro license key!

  2. CHRISTMAS GIVEAWAY: SPYSHELTER PREMIUM GIVEAWAY

    Get a free license key for SpyShelter Premium. We are giving away free SpyShelter Premium keys for our awesome members!

    (LIVE) Get now a SpyShelter Premium license key!

Memory Usage Test to See Which is the Lightest Antivirus Software

Discussion in 'Other Security Related Discussions' started by jamescv7, Apr 30, 2013.

  1. jamescv7

    jamescv7 Community Superstar Trusted Member

    Reputation:
    103
    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2011
    Messages:
    6,673
    Likes Received:
    1,340
    From Raymond.CC blog

    Tested conduction varied from system to system

    Avast and Webroot are not really surprise in terms of Memory Usage test and its proven until now. ;)
     
    FreddyFreeloader likes this.
  2. DrBeenGolfing

    DrBeenGolfing

    Reputation:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2013
    Messages:
    570
    Likes Received:
    4
    One of the most common things users do to try and keep their computer running as smooth as possible, is keep control over which programs start with Windows. Having just a few memory or processor hungry programs loading into the system tray on boot can have an adverse affect on the performance of your computer. One of the most common applications that will load with Windows and stay resident in the background while the system is on, will be your chosen antivirus software. Have you ever wondered which are the lightest antivirus packages available and which ones don’t do so well on memory usage?

    Read more: http://www.raymond.cc/blog/which-free-antivirus-is-the-lightest-on-system-memory-usage/#ixzz2SBOWvoTK[hr]
    Oops, sorry Jamescv7 - didn't see your post in time.
     
    FreddyFreeloader likes this.
  3. DrBeenGolfing

    DrBeenGolfing

    Reputation:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2013
    Messages:
    570
    Likes Received:
    4
    My Bitdefender runs a bit less in memory than Raymond's does - a lot less.
    [​IMG][/img]
     
  4. Littlebits

    Littlebits Super Moderator MalwareTips Staff

    Reputation:
    1,000
    Joined:
    May 3, 2011
    Messages:
    4,004
    Likes Received:
    3,114
    Raymond used Process Explorer which will give different results then Task Manager.

    Also note this is just a system memory test which may or may not affect system response time. Process I/O (reads writes) will have more effect on system lags.

    Thanks.:D
     
  5. DrBeenGolfing

    DrBeenGolfing

    Reputation:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2013
    Messages:
    570
    Likes Received:
    4
    OK, thanks. Never ran PE before, just downloaded it and results were about as Raymonds were. Neat tool, will keep it.
     
  6. McLovin

    McLovin Well-Known Member

    Reputation:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2011
    Messages:
    8,385
    Likes Received:
    248
    Who would of known that Trend was so far down. I've always had no problem with them.
     
  7. Malware Man

    Malware Man Regular Member

    Reputation:
    1
    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2013
    Messages:
    235
    Likes Received:
    61
    No surprise avast! has the lowest memory usage. I am currently using it and it's sitting now at around only 6mb, it's incredible.
     
  8. Littlebits

    Littlebits Super Moderator MalwareTips Staff

    Reputation:
    1,000
    Joined:
    May 3, 2011
    Messages:
    4,004
    Likes Received:
    3,114
    Avast may use less memory but there are other solutions that don't cause an increase in system response time. How much memory is used by a product doesn't indicate how light it will run on your system.

    MSE/Windows Defender, AVG Free and Avira Free hardly ever cause system lags compared to Avast. Even if they use more memory.

    Don't get me wrong I use Avast Free because of its features but it is not the lightest antivirus. It just uses less memory not the lightest AV.

    I wished testing sites would stop testing memory used by software because it is not a accurate way to see how light a software will run.

    Testing Process I/O (reads writes) will give you much better accuracy on how light a program will run.

    Thanks.:D
     
  9. Spirit

    Spirit Regular Member

    Reputation:
    0
    Joined:
    May 17, 2012
    Messages:
    1,898
    Likes Received:
    18
    Does it Matter ?

    In my personal experience it does not matter

    Maybe I am wrong.

    I find Eset lightest among the others which use 1/4 of less memory consume by eset

    Thanks
     
  10. Payback

    Payback Regular Member

    Reputation:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2013
    Messages:
    325
    Likes Received:
    6
    I'm pretty sure it's not going to be Eset Smart Security or Kaspersky. Or I'll cut my...censored off.
     
  11. tapoo

    tapoo Active Member

    Reputation:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2012
    Messages:
    646
    Likes Received:
    168
    isn't it depends also on CPU usage at the particular time ???
     
  12. GA4E1

    GA4E1 Regular Member

    Reputation:
    0
    Joined:
    May 4, 2013
    Messages:
    64
    Likes Received:
    1
    I wonder where does Microsoft Security Essentials falls in terms of the topic being discussed. Both while on scanning procedure an when on idle.
     
  13. Malware Man

    Malware Man Regular Member

    Reputation:
    1
    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2013
    Messages:
    235
    Likes Received:
    61
    I get what you mean. But I've always used Avast since version 4.8 and when it had those alarm sounds. It saved me a lot back then because I didn't know what I was doing. Now I have more experience. So I don't get infected much at all.

    I trust Avast a lot more than MSE/Windows defender. Avast has a much better detection rate. Even if I am using Windows 8. I still trust Avast more and it doesn't slow down my laptop at all. It has never given me issues.

    I wish they would stop to. You cannot judge a AV on it's memory usage. Eset uses about over 100mb of RAM and it doesn't impact system performance. Now Zone alarm on the other hand is a complete joke with it using 200mb+ of RAM.
     
  14. Littlebits

    Littlebits Super Moderator MalwareTips Staff

    Reputation:
    1,000
    Joined:
    May 3, 2011
    Messages:
    4,004
    Likes Received:
    3,114
    If you have a newer system with at least 2GB of RAM and a multi-core processor, then it doesn't matter about how much memory your AV uses because 2GB of RAM is more than enough to run just about any AV. Unless you are a gamer or run large memory consuming programs.

    Back in the days of Windows XP where most platforms were 32-bit, basic installed RAM was only 512MB and only had single core processors, memory usage was very important for AV's.

    So unless you are still using an ancient system, memory usage should not be considered when choosing an AV.

    According to Raymond test, ZoneAlarm Free Antivirus + Firewall used the most memory but I have it installed on my other system with 2GB of RAM, multi-core CPU with Windows Vista 64 bit and it runs extremely light. No system lags at all, whereas with other AV's listed on Raymond's test that used much less memory caused this system to lag and have slow response time when starting up programs or using Windows Explorer.

    So it is not true for newer system that memory consumption by AV's makes them more heavier.

    Thanks.:D
     
  15. Spirit

    Spirit Regular Member

    Reputation:
    0
    Joined:
    May 17, 2012
    Messages:
    1,898
    Likes Received:
    18
    In old days where machine was not so powerful even Avg used to slow down but now bitdefender/kaspersky is not much noticeable.

    My Point is Even on the same system with same hardware/software I think it does not matter if antivirus use more memory than other antivirus,still you feel av which consume more memory is lighter than using less.

    Simple examples are Eset & Mse.

    :)
     
  16. phyniks

    phyniks Active Member

    Reputation:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2013
    Messages:
    218
    Likes Received:
    489
    MSE is not faster than Avast.....it slows down windows explorer

    check latest av-comparatives for performance and you ll see MSE is not that good
     
    conceptualclarity likes this.
  17. Littlebits

    Littlebits Super Moderator MalwareTips Staff

    Reputation:
    1,000
    Joined:
    May 3, 2011
    Messages:
    4,004
    Likes Received:
    3,114
    It all depends on how many files are in that folder and what type of files they are, don't believe testing sites test it yourself.
    If you have a lot of executable files in a folder then Avast will lag a few moments. If you open a folder full of only pictures or audio files, then no lag at all.

    Thanks. :D
     
    phyniks likes this.

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Loading...
MalwareTips.com is an independent website.All trademarks mentioned on this page are the property of their respective owners.