Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Norton Internet Security 2014(bunyip783)
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Amiga500" data-source="post: 145169" data-attributes="member: 5244"><p>Im curious.</p><p></p><p>Why in this test have you used more files in the detection rate test than other tests.?</p><p></p><p>Why have you used different files for different security programs.?</p><p></p><p>For any of your tests to have any form of validity you MUST use the same set of files for every security program.</p><p></p><p>for example you used approximately 190 files for the webroot test and yet you have used over 200 files for this norton test.</p><p></p><p>Why is there a discrepency.?</p><p></p><p>Most people also would not turn off their antivirus in a real world usage scenario.</p><p></p><p>How do we the you-tube viewers know for certain that the files you used were indeed malicious.?</p><p></p><p>Im sorry but i dont find these home grown tests remotely credible .</p><p></p><p>In all the you-tube tests ive seen there has always been a wide variation in the files used and the sources of these files are never disclosed so proof of actual malicious intent is from evident.</p><p></p><p>I say the end detection rate test is futile as nobody is stupid enough to turn off their antivirus.</p><p></p><p>Have a good day.!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Amiga500, post: 145169, member: 5244"] Im curious. Why in this test have you used more files in the detection rate test than other tests.? Why have you used different files for different security programs.? For any of your tests to have any form of validity you MUST use the same set of files for every security program. for example you used approximately 190 files for the webroot test and yet you have used over 200 files for this norton test. Why is there a discrepency.? Most people also would not turn off their antivirus in a real world usage scenario. How do we the you-tube viewers know for certain that the files you used were indeed malicious.? Im sorry but i dont find these home grown tests remotely credible . In all the you-tube tests ive seen there has always been a wide variation in the files used and the sources of these files are never disclosed so proof of actual malicious intent is from evident. I say the end detection rate test is futile as nobody is stupid enough to turn off their antivirus. Have a good day.! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top