- Jun 12, 2014
- 314
Test has been commissioned by Malwarebytes.
Full report:
-http://pcsl.r.worldssl.net/report/exploit/rce_mitigations_201408_en_malwarebytes.pdf
Why wasn't Malwarebytes Anti-Exploit Free included in the test?
View attachment 17588
http://malwaretips.com/threads/would-you-buy-malwarebytes-anti-exploit-premium.28869/
The main problem I have with this test is that was done on Windows XP.
Does it have any exploit protection?No Emsisoft Anti-Malware?
Why not? it's exploit protection is not mature but it's BB can detect exploits.Does it have any exploit protection?
markloman said:With disbelief we took notion of this comparative test. I will not go into details but we filed a complaint and insist on removal of our beta software from their report. Because even though this report states that they downloaded the software from the official website, our software is not even released or on our website. That is because our software is still in development, attesting the preview builds that we only post here on Wilders Security. Our preview builds only includes functionality that we would like to have tested. Our software clearly states Preview and the release notes state that it is not for production environments.
In addition, the test was not done carefully. For example, PCSL did not add the standalone QuickTime Player to Alert's Exploit Mitigations while testing CVE-2012-0663, which the tester did not forgot while testing EMET.
Since we did not ask PCSL to include our experimental software nor gave them permission to put it up against production software, we can only belief that their client insisted on including it for no other reason than slander.