SuperAntispyware Pro Vs Malwarebytes Premium

[trainbus120]

I had Malwarebytes Premium installed on my system and full system scan done already. While reading across, I found about Superantispyware. Though this is not new, still thought of trying the same on my PC. My PC had the following realtime protections :

• Bitdefender Security Suit
• Malwarebytes Premium
• Zemana Antilogger
• Adguard 5 Premium.

The screen shot below says it all.

Shocking? Can this be interpreted in any other way??? Calling all experts ::

 

[kaljukass]

But what exactly do you want to say or what you want to hear? What is the message?

 

[trainbus120]

Read the first 5 lines carefully, that is what I wish to say.

 

[nissimezra]

The question is if it's not false positive

 

[juhful]

Malwarebytes has a much better detection rate against real malware, not cookies. SAS isn't in the same league in my opinion having used both, and yes SAS has more false positives.

 

[trainbus120]

Maybe, or maynot be, the files detected were probably undesirable

The question is if it's not false positive

 

[trainbus120]

Malwarebytes has a much better detection rate against real malware, not cookies. SAS isn't in the same league in my opinion having used both, and yes SAS has more false positives.

Hi, how do u actually define false positive? I have deleted what ever was detected by sas

 

[juhful]

A false positive is when a non malicious file is detected as malware and sometimes when you delete them it harms your computer because it is needed by the system or a certain program to function properly. I am not saying that what you had was a false positive but SAS is more likely to have more false positives than Malwarebytes, and as you can see SAS detects cookies and they are not malware. As always it is best to make sure the files that are detected are malicious or not so using more than one on demand scanner can help with this or send to Virus Total

 

[trainbus120]

A false positive is when a non malicious file is detected as malware and sometimes when you delete them it harms your computer because it is needed by the system or a certain program to function properly. I am not saying that what you had was a false positive but SAS is more likely to have more false positives than Malwarebytes, and as you can see SAS detects cookies and they are not malware. As always it is best to make sure the files that are detected are malicious or not so using more than one on demand scanner can help with this or send to Virus Total

Thanks, again what is virus total?

 

[juhful]

Thanks, again what is virus total?

https://www.virustotal.com/ you can upload files and it gets checked by over 50 AV's it can also check web addresses

 

[Cain]

I have used SAS and while I would not purchase the application for the on demand support, I still think that it is a good and useful application to run periodically as it does a great job of cleaning out a lot of junk such as tracking cookies that most other cleaners leave behind, I was surprised by how much junk can be left on the system even after doing a sweep with other utilities like Ashampoo Winoptimize and Glary Utilities.

 

[trainbus120]

https://www.virustotal.com/ you can upload files and it gets checked by over 50 AV's it can also check web addresses

Wow... Thanks for the share buddy

 

[trainbus120]

I have used SAS and while I would not purchase the application for the on demand support, I still think that it is a good and useful application to run periodically as it does a great job of cleaning out a lot of junk such as tracking cookies that most other cleaners leave behind, I was surprised by how much junk can be left on the system even after doing a sweep with other utilities like Ashampoo Winoptimize and Glary Utilities.

Yes, you may also try ccleaner, smallest and fastest.

 

[juhful]

I have used SAS and while I would not purchase the application for the on demand support, I still think that it is a good and useful application to run periodically as it does a great job of cleaning out a lot of junk such as tracking cookies that most other cleaners leave behind, I was surprised by how much junk can be left on the system even after doing a sweep with other utilities like Ashampoo Winoptimize and Glary Utilities.

Reminds me of the first time I used Privazer, I was using Ccleaner and decided to try Privazer, it found gigs of stuff CC left behind lol

 

[Cain]

Thanks, again what is virus total?

Have a look at the VirusTotal Uploader It's an excellent little system extension to have, uses nothing to have it ready to use and makes it very easy to get a quick second opinion on any questionable files you may come across

 

[juhful]

Wow... Thanks for the share buddy

You're welcome.

 

[trainbus120]

Have a look at the VirusTotal Uploader It's an excellent little system extension to have, uses nothing to have it ready to use and makes it very easy to get a quick second opinion on any questionable files you may come across [/QUOTE
Sure. Thanks

Sure thanks

 

[trainbus120]

Reminds me of the first time I used Privazer, I was using Ccleaner and decided to try Privazer, it found gigs of stuff CC left behind lol

Is Privazer free?

 

[juhful]

Is Privazer free?

Yes it is free, they ask for donations on their website. You can download it from softpedia

 

[Cain]

Sure thanks

You're Welcome.