Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="DardiM" data-source="post: 518636" data-attributes="member: 52613">&quot;Files not detected at VT doesn&#039;t means not malicious&quot;&nbsp; =&gt; and doesn&#039;t mean malicious <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite109" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />(none of the file 166 last files can run on my custom setting, then with a dynamic test =&gt; 100 %)I tested with Crystal Security all engines only the 166 sample not detected by KTS.- 57 reported as safe- only 24 unknownWith today&#039;s update ZAM =&gt; 961/1000 detectedI&#039;m really impressed by the 100 % (even if these are old samples). But I can&#039;t stop asking myself one thing :What about &quot;Also, keep in mind, all software was tested in their default settings… simply because the absolute vast majority of users run with all default settings&quot; ?!From <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/VoodooShield" target="_blank">VoodooShield</a> (on their youtube)&quot;We did have to make some adjustments to VoodooShield so that it would act more like a traditional antivirus software as opposed to an application whitelister, and all of the adjustments are shown at the beginning of the VoodooShield test&quot;So, a &quot;normal&quot; user who purchase VS and install it whit default setting will it have the 100 % result ?I will answer myself : purchased today <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite109" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="DardiM, post: 518636, member: 52613"] [I]"Files not detected at VT doesn't means not malicious" => [/I]and doesn't mean malicious :) (none of the file 166 last files can run on my custom setting, then with a dynamic test => 100 %) [B][/B] I tested with Crystal Security [U]all engines[/U] only the 166 sample not detected by KTS. - 57 reported as safe - [U]only[/U] [COLOR=#b30000]24[/COLOR] unknown With today's update ZAM => 961/1000 detected [COLOR=#0000b3]I'm really impressed by the 100 % (even if these are old samples)[/COLOR]. But I can't stop asking myself one thing : [B]What about[/B] [I]"[/I][COLOR=rgb(0, 102, 51)][I]Also, keep in mind, all software[U] was tested in their default settings[/U]… simply because the absolute vast majority of users run with all default settings[/I][/COLOR][I]" [/I][B]?![/B] [B]From[/B] [URL='https://www.youtube.com/user/VoodooShield']VoodooShield[/URL] (on their youtube) [I][COLOR=#006633]"We did have to make [U]some adjustments[/U] to VoodooShield so that [U]it would act more like a traditional antivirus software[/U] as opposed to an application whitelister, and all of the adjustments are shown at the beginning of the VoodooShield test" [/COLOR][/I] [COLOR=#0000b3]So, a "normal" user who purchase VS and install it whit [U]default setting[/U] will it have the 100 % result ? [/COLOR] [B][COLOR=#0000b3]I will answer myself : purchased today :) [/COLOR][/B] [/QUOTE]

Verification