Serious Discussion 7 NGAV(ML Based) detection rates comparison

[ShenguiTurmi]

This test uses 30 samples of various types to compare the machine learning detection rates of seven of the better known NGAVs
Sample source: CrowdStrike Threat Intelligence
Notes:
1. Since the source of the samples is CrowdStrike, the results of CrowdStrike are not counted in this test.
2. Since most of the samples are in the wild and the sample files are not available, only the results from VirusTotal are counted in this test, and there may be differences between the results and the commercial versions of the corresponding software.
3. In order to exclude some of the NGAV cloud blacklisting (e.g. DeepInstinct and Cylance), only samples that were scanned once by VirusTotal were included in this test.
4. As the hacker group information corresponding to the sample is a copyrighted asset of CrowdStrike, I will only include the family name of the sample, not the name of the hacker group and the target of the attack.

Result:

Original text:

Sync | Secure cloud storage that protects your privacy

ln5.sync.com

 

[Trident]

Unfortunately, VT is not to be used under any circumstances to measure antivirus effectiveness, which renders the whole test interesting, but not useful. It’s more on the marketing side.