Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="cruelsister" data-source="post: 1062744" data-attributes="member: 7463">Personally I&#039;ve never seen system files being blocked by Comodo UNLESS one plays with HIPS settings, which is never a good idea. Actually the use of HIPS in CF is of dubious value as it will in no way enhance protection as long as Containment is enabled (for CF, although counter-intuitive,&nbsp; less is more).As to some legitimate applications being blocked, yes, this will occur because Comodo must vet an unknown application prior to plopping it into the Unknown category. Personally I fee that the upside will outweigh any downside, as although a SeaMonkey nightly may be contained,&nbsp; also contained would be things like the (formerly) legitimately signed and countersigned&nbsp; EFile and Chrome Update data stealers which initially bypassed all others.As to the thousands and thousands of supposed bugs, sadly this is more of a trollish urban legend than actual reality.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="cruelsister, post: 1062744, member: 7463"] Personally I've never seen system files being blocked by Comodo UNLESS one plays with HIPS settings, which is never a good idea. Actually the use of HIPS in CF is of dubious value as it will in no way enhance protection as long as Containment is enabled (for CF, although counter-intuitive, less is more). As to some legitimate applications being blocked, yes, this will occur because Comodo must vet an unknown application prior to plopping it into the Unknown category. Personally I fee that the upside will outweigh any downside, as although a SeaMonkey nightly may be contained, also contained would be things like the (formerly) legitimately signed and countersigned EFile and Chrome Update data stealers which initially bypassed all others. As to the thousands and thousands of supposed bugs, sadly this is more of a trollish urban legend than actual reality. [/QUOTE]

Verification