Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Vitali Ortzi" data-source="post: 1066699" data-attributes="member: 57714">Its one of the most performance friendly default isolation tech and most convenientYes you would be more secure running an actual hypervisor over isolation of parts of the os like comodo but since most malware isn&#039;t targeting comodo specifically it&#039;s good enough to stop all known malware with the right settingsif you give an actual pentester to breakdown how it works and fuzz it&#039;s weakness he obviously would be able to exactly how they escape much higher restricted sandboxesSo only skidder proof not an attacker who has skill and time to specifically attack itFor those probably better using a different security approach and would know the least attack surface the better so they wouldn&#039;t install any security rather secure by reduction of surface areaObviously comodo has plenty of consMostly because of low market share and it&#039;s true there are obvious reasons why the market share of comodo reached this pointBut I&#039;m still using it to protect against attacks on my family PCbest security software per amount of time needed to check false&nbsp; alarms on their ends as it allows known trusted programs and disallow even some signed stuff that could have stolen certs wich&nbsp; isn&#039;t recognized by comodoNo free product has ability to block stolen cert malware while having&nbsp; somewhat minimal&nbsp; amount of false positives for an office user</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Vitali Ortzi, post: 1066699, member: 57714"] Its one of the most performance friendly default isolation tech and most convenient Yes you would be more secure running an actual hypervisor over isolation of parts of the os like comodo but since most malware isn't targeting comodo specifically it's good enough to stop all known malware with the right settings if you give an actual pentester to breakdown how it works and fuzz it's weakness he obviously would be able to exactly how they escape much higher restricted sandboxes So only skidder proof not an attacker who has skill and time to specifically attack it For those probably better using a different security approach and would know the least attack surface the better so they wouldn't install any security rather secure by reduction of surface area Obviously comodo has plenty of cons Mostly because of low market share and it's true there are obvious reasons why the market share of comodo reached this point But I'm still using it to protect against attacks on my family PC best security software per amount of time needed to check false alarms on their ends as it allows known trusted programs and disallow even some signed stuff that could have stolen certs wich isn't recognized by comodo No free product has ability to block stolen cert malware while having somewhat minimal amount of false positives for an office user [/QUOTE]

Verification